TY - JOUR
T1 - 3q26/EVI1 rearrangement in myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms
T2 - An early event associated with a poor prognosis
AU - Hu, Zhihong
AU - Hu, Shimin
AU - Ji, Changsheng
AU - Tang, Zhenya
AU - Thakral, Beenu
AU - Loghavi, Sanam
AU - Medeiros, L. Jeffrey
AU - Wang, Wei
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2018/2
Y1 - 2018/2
N2 - 3q26.2/EVI1 rearrangements resulting in EVI1 overexpression play an important role in leukemogenesis and are associated with treatment resistance and a poorer prognosis in patients with acute myeloid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome, chronic myeloid leukemia and BCR-ABL negative myeloproliferative neoplasms. In this study, we aim to explore the clinicopathological features of myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative (MDS/MPN) neoplasms with 3q26.2/EVI1 rearrangements and determine the potential impact of these cytogenetic abnormalities on treatment response and survival. The study group included 12 cases of MDS/MPN with 3q26.2 rearrangements detected by conventional karyotyping. There were 7 men and 5 women with a median age of 67 years (range, 51–79 years) at time of initial MDS/MPN diagnosis. Ten cases were classified as chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) and 2 were MDS/MPN, unclassifiable. Among CMML cases, 5 (50%) were proliferative type and 5 (50%) were dysplastic type. Based on blast counts, these 10 CMML were: CMML-0 (n = 2), CMML-1 (n = 3), and CMML-2 (n = 5). Eleven (92%) patients had 3q26 rearrangements at the initial diagnosis. Inv(3)(q21q26.2) was most common, identified in 7(58%) patients, followed by t(3;21)(q26.2;q22) in 2 patients and 1 patient each with t(3;3)(q21;q26.2), t(2;3)(p21;q26-27), and t(3;6)(q26.2;q26). Six (50%) patients had 3q26.2 rearrangements as a sole cytogenetic abnormality and 6 (50%) patients had additional cytogenetic abnormalities. Molecular studies revealed DNMT3A mutations in all 3 patients assessed and RAS mutations in 2 of 8 (25%) patients. No mutations in ASXL1 (n = 3), TET2 (n = 3), FLT3 ITD/D835 (n = 10), and CEBPA (n = 7) were detected. Most patients received hypomethylating agent based chemotherapy. The median follow-up was 11.5 months (range, 1.5–24 months) and at time of last follow-up, 11 (92%) died with a median survival of 13.4 months (range, 1.5–24 months). The only patient alive had a relatively short follow-up of 2.4 months and showed disease progression at the last visit. In conclusion, 3q26.2/EVI1 rearrangements are a rare event and usually present at time of initial diagnosis in MDS/MPN. The presence of 3q26.2/EVI1 rearrangements in MDS/MPN is associated with rapid disease progression, poor response to treatment, and a poor prognosis.
AB - 3q26.2/EVI1 rearrangements resulting in EVI1 overexpression play an important role in leukemogenesis and are associated with treatment resistance and a poorer prognosis in patients with acute myeloid leukemia, myelodysplastic syndrome, chronic myeloid leukemia and BCR-ABL negative myeloproliferative neoplasms. In this study, we aim to explore the clinicopathological features of myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative (MDS/MPN) neoplasms with 3q26.2/EVI1 rearrangements and determine the potential impact of these cytogenetic abnormalities on treatment response and survival. The study group included 12 cases of MDS/MPN with 3q26.2 rearrangements detected by conventional karyotyping. There were 7 men and 5 women with a median age of 67 years (range, 51–79 years) at time of initial MDS/MPN diagnosis. Ten cases were classified as chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) and 2 were MDS/MPN, unclassifiable. Among CMML cases, 5 (50%) were proliferative type and 5 (50%) were dysplastic type. Based on blast counts, these 10 CMML were: CMML-0 (n = 2), CMML-1 (n = 3), and CMML-2 (n = 5). Eleven (92%) patients had 3q26 rearrangements at the initial diagnosis. Inv(3)(q21q26.2) was most common, identified in 7(58%) patients, followed by t(3;21)(q26.2;q22) in 2 patients and 1 patient each with t(3;3)(q21;q26.2), t(2;3)(p21;q26-27), and t(3;6)(q26.2;q26). Six (50%) patients had 3q26.2 rearrangements as a sole cytogenetic abnormality and 6 (50%) patients had additional cytogenetic abnormalities. Molecular studies revealed DNMT3A mutations in all 3 patients assessed and RAS mutations in 2 of 8 (25%) patients. No mutations in ASXL1 (n = 3), TET2 (n = 3), FLT3 ITD/D835 (n = 10), and CEBPA (n = 7) were detected. Most patients received hypomethylating agent based chemotherapy. The median follow-up was 11.5 months (range, 1.5–24 months) and at time of last follow-up, 11 (92%) died with a median survival of 13.4 months (range, 1.5–24 months). The only patient alive had a relatively short follow-up of 2.4 months and showed disease progression at the last visit. In conclusion, 3q26.2/EVI1 rearrangements are a rare event and usually present at time of initial diagnosis in MDS/MPN. The presence of 3q26.2/EVI1 rearrangements in MDS/MPN is associated with rapid disease progression, poor response to treatment, and a poor prognosis.
KW - 3q26/EVI1
KW - MDS/MPN
KW - Prognosis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85039172853&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85039172853&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.leukres.2017.12.004
DO - 10.1016/j.leukres.2017.12.004
M3 - Article
C2 - 29288910
AN - SCOPUS:85039172853
SN - 0145-2126
VL - 65
SP - 25
EP - 28
JO - Leukemia Research
JF - Leukemia Research
ER -