TY - GEN
T1 - A comparison of BGO, GSO, MLS, LGSO, LYSO and LSO scintillation materials for high-spatial-resolution animal PET detectors
AU - Ramirez, Rocio A.
AU - Wong, Wai Hoi
AU - Kim, Soonseok
AU - Baghaei, Hossain
AU - Li, Hongdi
AU - Wang, Yu
AU - Zhang, Yuxuan
AU - Liu, Shitao
AU - Liu, Jiguo
AU - Xie, Shuping
AU - Liu, Yaqiang
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2008 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2005
Y1 - 2005
N2 - We are developing very-high resolution detector blocks for animal PET applications. We studied different scintillating crystals materials, BGO, GSO, LSO, MLS, LGSO, and LYSO, to determine the most suitable material for a low cost and high-resolution detector. In this study, we measured and evaluated two different light-output data from individual crystal samples (two different sizes of needles): The scintillation light output received by the PMT as used in PET (LOPET) and'the intrinsic light output (ILO). The ILO data, were measured with the largest side of crystal needles coupled to the PMT (crystal needles "lying down onto the PMT"), the LOPET data, were measured with the smallest crystal end coupled to the PMT as used in a PET detector (the crystal is "standing up" on the PMT). The pulse-height spectra for both ILO and LOPET were acquired for all the individual crystal samples, for deducing the percentages of light loss from self-absorption (LLSA) in the PET detector configuration, and energy resolution in both positions (ILO-ER and LOPET-ER). With these crystals, four detectors blocks were also developed, and we measured the overall light output and the position-decoding maps to gauge the decoding capability (DC) of the crystals. We also compared the visual color and clarity of individual crystals and detector blocks. For the two different sizes of the crystal samples that we received, we have the following finding: (a) For the 1.3×1.3×10 mm crystals "standing up" as used in a PET camera, GSO, MLS and LYSO, lost almost half of the light while LSO lost more than 2/3 thereby ended up with the same light output as GSO. The energy resolution of LSO and GSO are quite similar (16% and 15%); but the light absorption is significant higher in LSO (71%) in comparison to GSO (54%), MLS (52%) and LYSO (48%). (b) For the 2×2×10 mm, the light loss from self-absorption (LLSA) was less than the 1.3 mm samples. MLS has the lowest self-absorption (26%), while GSO and LSO have the highest light loss. LGSO and LSO have the lowest LOPET for all the lutetium crystals tested. (c) From the position-decoding results from the detector blocks, LYSO, MLS and GSO provided better position-decoding resolution than the LSO. (d) For the visually comparison, LSO were visually much darker than the other Lutetium crystals.
AB - We are developing very-high resolution detector blocks for animal PET applications. We studied different scintillating crystals materials, BGO, GSO, LSO, MLS, LGSO, and LYSO, to determine the most suitable material for a low cost and high-resolution detector. In this study, we measured and evaluated two different light-output data from individual crystal samples (two different sizes of needles): The scintillation light output received by the PMT as used in PET (LOPET) and'the intrinsic light output (ILO). The ILO data, were measured with the largest side of crystal needles coupled to the PMT (crystal needles "lying down onto the PMT"), the LOPET data, were measured with the smallest crystal end coupled to the PMT as used in a PET detector (the crystal is "standing up" on the PMT). The pulse-height spectra for both ILO and LOPET were acquired for all the individual crystal samples, for deducing the percentages of light loss from self-absorption (LLSA) in the PET detector configuration, and energy resolution in both positions (ILO-ER and LOPET-ER). With these crystals, four detectors blocks were also developed, and we measured the overall light output and the position-decoding maps to gauge the decoding capability (DC) of the crystals. We also compared the visual color and clarity of individual crystals and detector blocks. For the two different sizes of the crystal samples that we received, we have the following finding: (a) For the 1.3×1.3×10 mm crystals "standing up" as used in a PET camera, GSO, MLS and LYSO, lost almost half of the light while LSO lost more than 2/3 thereby ended up with the same light output as GSO. The energy resolution of LSO and GSO are quite similar (16% and 15%); but the light absorption is significant higher in LSO (71%) in comparison to GSO (54%), MLS (52%) and LYSO (48%). (b) For the 2×2×10 mm, the light loss from self-absorption (LLSA) was less than the 1.3 mm samples. MLS has the lowest self-absorption (26%), while GSO and LSO have the highest light loss. LGSO and LSO have the lowest LOPET for all the lutetium crystals tested. (c) From the position-decoding results from the detector blocks, LYSO, MLS and GSO provided better position-decoding resolution than the LSO. (d) For the visually comparison, LSO were visually much darker than the other Lutetium crystals.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33846643642&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33846643642&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/NSSMIC.2005.1596923
DO - 10.1109/NSSMIC.2005.1596923
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:33846643642
SN - 0780392213
SN - 9780780392212
T3 - IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record
SP - 2835
EP - 2839
BT - 2005 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record -Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference
T2 - Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2005 IEEE
Y2 - 23 October 2005 through 29 October 2005
ER -