Adverse events associated with laparoscopy vs laparotomy in the treatment of endometrial cancer

Objective: The objective of the study was to compare adverse event rates between laparoscopic vs open surgery for endometrial cancer. Study Design: This was a retrospective cohort study comparing 107 women who underwent laparoscopy with 269 age- and body mass indexmatched women who underwent laparotomy for treatment of endometrial cancer. Results: Adverse event rates were similar between cohorts (37% laparoscopy vs 43% laparotomy, P =.248). Laparotomies had higher rates of cellulitis (16% vs 7%, P =.018) and open wound infection (9% vs 2%, P =.02), whereas laparoscopy had higher rates of sensory peripheral nerve deficit (5% vs 0%, P =.008) and lymphedema (7% vs 1%, P =.003). Laparoscopy was associated with longer mean operating room times but with shorter hospital stays and lower mean blood loss. Conclusion: Laparoscopy was associated with decreased rates of surgical site infections but had an increased risk of peripheral sensory nerve deficits and lymphedema when compared with laparotomy.