An 11-item measure of user- And human-centered design for personal health tools (UCD-11): Development and validation

Holly O. Witteman, Gratianne Vaisson, Thierry Provencher, Selma Chipenda Dansokho, Heather Colquhoun, Michele Dugas, Angela Fagerlin, Anik M.C. Giguere, Lynne Haslett, Aubri Hoffman, Noah M. Ivers, France Légaré, Marie Eve Trottier, Dawn Stacey, Robert J. Volk, Jean Sébastien Renaud

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Researchers developing personal health tools employ a range of approaches to involve prospective users in design and development. Objective: The aim of this paper was to develop a validated measure of the human- or user-centeredness of design and development processes for personal health tools. Methods: We conducted a psychometric analysis of data from a previous systematic review of the design and development processes of 348 personal health tools. Using a conceptual framework of user-centered design, our team of patients, caregivers, health professionals, tool developers, and researchers analyzed how specific practices in tool design and development might be combined and used as a measure. We prioritized variables according to their importance within the conceptual framework and validated the resultant measure using principal component analysis with Varimax rotation, classical item analysis, and confirmatory factor analysis. Results: We retained 11 items in a 3-factor structure explaining 68% of the variance in the data. The Cronbach alpha was .72. Confirmatory factor analysis supported our hypothesis of a latent construct of user-centeredness. Items were whether or not: (1) patient, family, caregiver, or surrogate users were involved in the steps that help tool developers understand users or (2) develop a prototype, (3) asked their opinions, (4) observed using the tool or (5) involved in steps intended to evaluate the tool, (6) the process had 3 or more iterative cycles, (7) changes between cycles were explicitly reported, (8) health professionals were asked their opinion and (9) consulted before the first prototype was developed or (10) between initial and final prototypes, and (11) a panel of other experts was involved. Conclusions: The User-Centered Design 11-item measure (UCD-11) may be used to quantitatively document the user/human-centeredness of design and development processes of patient-centered tools. By building an evidence base about such processes, we can help ensure that tools are adapted to people who will use them, rather than requiring people to adapt to tools.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere15032
JournalJournal of medical Internet research
Volume23
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2021

Keywords

  • Co-design
  • Health services research
  • Human-centered design
  • Human-centred design
  • Humans
  • Index
  • Instrument
  • Patient and public involvement
  • Patient participation
  • Patient-centered care
  • Scale
  • Surveys and questionnaires
  • User-centered design
  • User-centred design
  • Validation studies as topic

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Health Informatics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An 11-item measure of user- And human-centered design for personal health tools (UCD-11): Development and validation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this