TY - JOUR
T1 - Analyzing the Landscape of the 2021 Virtual Match
T2 - A Nationwide Survey of Radiology Programs’ Stakeholders
AU - Kamel, Serageldin
AU - Wang, Mindy X.
AU - Guccione, Jeffrey
AU - Zhang, Xu
AU - Taher, Ahmed
AU - Sanhaji, Latifa
AU - Hsieh, Peggy
AU - Ferguson, Emma
AU - Elsayes, Khaled M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Association of University Radiologists
PY - 2022/9
Y1 - 2022/9
N2 - Rationale and Objectives: We aimed to provide insights into the adaptive strategies, benefits, and challenges faced by the radiology programs during the 2021 residency virtual Match. Furthermore, we explored the potential impacts of related topics, such as diversity and social media use on the Match process and outcomes. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional survey of 31 questions was designed and distributed via e-mails to individuals involved radiology programs match process during the 2021 Match. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the results of most questions. Two questions comparing the changes in factors influencing the selection of applicants on a Likert scale of 1-5 were analyzed using paired t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test where p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Responses from 125 participants were analyzed. The following factors carried less weight in evaluating applicants during 2021 Match: away rotations (p < 0.01), no failed attempts in USMLE Step 1/CK (p < 0.01), grades in radiology clerkship (p < 0.04), and class rank/quartile (p < 0.04), while personal statements were more important (p < 0.03). Out of the 125 respondents, 80 (64%) and 58 (47%) strongly or somewhat agree on the effectiveness of virtual interviews in gauging applicants’ candidacy and showing their programs’ advantages, respectively. Advantages of virtual interviews included decreased cost, time flexibility, less faculty burden, and an increased number of offered interviews according to 81% (101/125), 46% (58/125), 40%, (50/125), and 34% (43/125), respectively. The most helpful platforms that showcased program advantages were program websites followed by Twitter and Instagram. Conclusion: Most radiology programs were able to adjust to the virtual interview process, and the majority agree on their effectiveness citing many benefits. However, there were mixed opinions if it could be sustained in future cycles.
AB - Rationale and Objectives: We aimed to provide insights into the adaptive strategies, benefits, and challenges faced by the radiology programs during the 2021 residency virtual Match. Furthermore, we explored the potential impacts of related topics, such as diversity and social media use on the Match process and outcomes. Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional survey of 31 questions was designed and distributed via e-mails to individuals involved radiology programs match process during the 2021 Match. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the results of most questions. Two questions comparing the changes in factors influencing the selection of applicants on a Likert scale of 1-5 were analyzed using paired t-test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test where p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Responses from 125 participants were analyzed. The following factors carried less weight in evaluating applicants during 2021 Match: away rotations (p < 0.01), no failed attempts in USMLE Step 1/CK (p < 0.01), grades in radiology clerkship (p < 0.04), and class rank/quartile (p < 0.04), while personal statements were more important (p < 0.03). Out of the 125 respondents, 80 (64%) and 58 (47%) strongly or somewhat agree on the effectiveness of virtual interviews in gauging applicants’ candidacy and showing their programs’ advantages, respectively. Advantages of virtual interviews included decreased cost, time flexibility, less faculty burden, and an increased number of offered interviews according to 81% (101/125), 46% (58/125), 40%, (50/125), and 34% (43/125), respectively. The most helpful platforms that showcased program advantages were program websites followed by Twitter and Instagram. Conclusion: Most radiology programs were able to adjust to the virtual interview process, and the majority agree on their effectiveness citing many benefits. However, there were mixed opinions if it could be sustained in future cycles.
KW - COVID-19
KW - Diversity
KW - Radiology residency
KW - Social media
KW - Virtual Match
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85120785974&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85120785974&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.acra.2021.10.029
DO - 10.1016/j.acra.2021.10.029
M3 - Article
C2 - 34865954
AN - SCOPUS:85120785974
SN - 1076-6332
VL - 29
SP - 1432
EP - 1446
JO - Academic radiology
JF - Academic radiology
IS - 9
ER -