Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Are adjuncts to induction chemotherapy worthwhile in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia?

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

Abstract

Research in non-transplant therapy of patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has been focused on approaches to improve the efficacy of the backbone of cytarabine and anthracycline induction and consolidation regimens through modifications of dose and schedule of these agents and the addition of other cytotoxic agents. More recent advances in understanding the molecular biology of the disease have not only led to better prediction of responsiveness to these traditional regimens, but have also led to the identification of molecular targets for development of novel agents. Future research is likely to focus on determining which candidates are the best among such novel agents and what is the most appropriate way of incorporating them into the existing chemotherapy regimens. Identification of potent targeted agents may even have the potential of replacing cytotoxic therapy at least in some subsets of AML.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)241-246
Number of pages6
JournalBest Practice and Research: Clinical Haematology
Volume27
Issue number3-4
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2014

Keywords

  • AML
  • acute myeloid leukemia
  • adjunct
  • anthracycline
  • chemotherapy
  • consolidation
  • cytarabine
  • induction
  • non-transplant
  • targeted agents

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Clinical Biochemistry

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Are adjuncts to induction chemotherapy worthwhile in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this