Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Bempegaldesleukin plus Nivolumab in First-line Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: Results from PIVOT-02

  • Arlene O. Siefker-Radtke
  • , Daniel C. Cho
  • , Adi Diab
  • , Mario Sznol
  • , Mehmet A. Bilen
  • , Arjun V. Balar
  • , Giovanni Grignani
  • , Erika Puente
  • , Lily Tang
  • , David Chien
  • , Ute Hoch
  • , Arkopal Choudhury
  • , Danni Yu
  • , Sue L. Currie
  • , Mary A. Tagliaferri
  • , Jonathan Zalevsky
  • , Michael E. Hurwitz
  • , Nizar M. Tannir

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Despite recent changes in the treatment landscape, there remains an unmet need for effective, tolerable, chemotherapy-free treatments for patients with advanced/metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC), especially cisplatin-ineligible patients. Objective: To evaluate the immunostimulatory interleukin-2 cytokine prodrug bempegaldesleukin (BEMPEG) plus nivolumab in patients with advanced/mUC from the phase 2 multicenter PIVOT-02 study. Design, setting, and participants: This open-label, multicohort phase 1/2 study enrolled patients with previously untreated locally advanced/surgically unresectable or mUC (N = 41). Intervention: Patients received BEMPEG 0.006 mg/kg plus nivolumab 360 mg intravenously every 3 wk. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The primary objectives were safety and the objective response rate (ORR) in patients with measurable disease at baseline and at least one postbaseline tumor response assessment (response-evaluable). Secondary objectives were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Exploratory biomarker analyses via univariate logistic regression were performed to test the association between potential biomarkers (CD8+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, tumor mutational burden, and IFN-γ gene expression profile) and response. Results and limitations: The ORR was 35% (13/37 evaluable patients) and the complete response rate was 19% (7/37 patients); the median duration of response was not reached. Median PFS was 4.1 mo (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.1–8.7) and median OS was 23.7 mo (95% CI 15.8–not reached). Overall, 40/41 patients (98%) experienced at least one treatment-related adverse event (TRAE); grade 3/4 TRAEs occurred in 11 patients (27%), most commonly pyrexia (4.9%; 2 patients). Exploratory biomarker analyses showed no association between biomarkers and response. Limitations include the small sample size and single-arm design. Conclusions: BEMPEG plus nivolumab was well tolerated and showed antitumor activity as first-line treatment in patients with locally advanced/mUC. Patient summary: We investigated an immune-stimulating prodrug called bempegaldesleukin plus the antibody nivolumab as the first therapy for patients with advanced or metastatic cancer of the urinary tract. This combination had manageable treatment-related side effects and was effective in a subset of patients. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT02983045.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)365-373
Number of pages9
JournalEuropean urology
Volume82
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 2022

Keywords

  • Immunotherapy
  • Interleukin-2
  • Nivolumab
  • Transitional cell
  • Urothelial carcinoma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Urology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Bempegaldesleukin plus Nivolumab in First-line Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma: Results from PIVOT-02'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this