Body mass index, calcium supplementation and risk of colorectal adenomas

Elizabeth L. Barry, Jennifer L. Lund, Daniel Westreich, Leila A. Mott, Dennis J. Ahnen, Gerald J. Beck, Roberd M. Bostick, Robert S. Bresalier, Carol A. Burke, Timothy R. Church, Judy R. Rees, Douglas J. Robertson, John A. Baron

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

Calcium supplementation (1,200 mg/day) did not significantly reduce colorectal adenomas in our recent randomized, controlled trial (Vitamin D/Calcium Polyp Prevention Study, VCPPS, 2004–2013) in contrast to our previous trial (Calcium Polyp Prevention Study, CPPS, 1988–1996). To reconcile these findings, we identified participant characteristics that differed between the study populations and modified the effect of calcium supplementation on adenomas or high-risk findings (advanced or multiple adenomas). Compared to the CPPS, more participants in the VCPPS were obese (body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m 2 ; 37.5% vs. 24.4%) and fewer had normal BMI (BMI <25 kg/m 2 ; 18.5% vs. 31%). BMI appeared to modify the effect of calcium supplementation on adenomas and especially on high risk-findings: in the VCPPS, there was a 44% reduction in high-risk findings among individuals whose BMI was normal (RR = 0.56, 95% CI = 0.26–1.23), but not among overweight (RR = 1.09, 95% CI = 0.62–1.91) or obese (RR = 1.54, 95% CI = 0.92–2.57) individuals (p interaction = 0.03). Similarly, in the CPPS, there was a 56% reduction in high-risk findings among individuals whose BMI was normal (RR = 0.44, 95% CI = 0.26–0.74), but not among overweight (RR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.55–1.39) or obese (RR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.57–1.82) individuals (p interaction = 0.02). Standardization of each trial's findings to the BMI distribution in the other attenuated calcium's protective effect on adenomas in the CPPS but enhanced it in the VCPPS. In conclusion, 1,200 mg/day calcium supplementation may reduce risk of colorectal adenomas among those with normal BMI but not in overweight or obese individuals; and differences in BMI distribution partially account for the apparent difference in calcium efficacy between the two trials.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)448-458
Number of pages11
JournalInternational journal of cancer
Volume144
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2019

Keywords

  • body mass index
  • calcium supplementation
  • clinical trial
  • colorectal adenoma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Body mass index, calcium supplementation and risk of colorectal adenomas'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this