TY - JOUR
T1 - Cancer Rehabilitation Providers and Oncology Patient Expectations for Functional Outcomes after Inpatient Rehabilitation
AU - Gupta, Ekta
AU - Ng, Amy H.
AU - Fu, Jack B.
AU - Yadav, Rajesh
AU - Ngo-Huang, An
AU - Bansal, Swati
AU - Park, Minjeong
AU - Bruera, Eduardo
N1 - Funding Information:
Prior presentations: Abstract presented at the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer Annual Meeting, Austria, Vienna in June 2018 and University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center/The Institute for Rehabilitation and Research (TIRR) Cancer Symposium, Houston, Texas in March 2019.Funding: Dr. Bruera receives research funding from Helsinn Healthcare SA, Strategic Collaboration Agreement Award No. 52626.Disclosures: none.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.
PY - 2021/7
Y1 - 2021/7
N2 - Background: Cancer rehabilitation is a valued resource for patients and oncologists. Cancer rehabilitation providers are seeing increasing numbers of referrals for inpatient rehabilitation as the number of cancer survivors grows. However, cancer rehabilitation providers, oncologists, therapists, patients, and caregivers may not always clearly communicate the goals of care, which can lead to different expectations for inpatient rehabilitation. Objective: To determine the difference in expectations of function after an acute inpatient rehabilitation stay between cancer patients and cancer rehabilitation providers and how they align with achieved goals after treatment. Design: Prospective survey study. Setting: Quaternary academic medical center inpatient rehabilitation unit. Participants: Out of 194 eligible patients, 132 were enrolled and completed admission surveys, and 110 completed the discharge survey. Twelve cancer rehabilitation providers completed the surveys. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Barthel Index. Results: Patients estimated their expected functional status as a median (interquartile range) score of 19 points (18, 20) using the Barthel Index, compared to cancer rehabilitation providers, who estimated a median score of 17 points (15, 19) (P <.001). Actual functional status upon discharge was a median score of 16 points (13, 18) using the Barthel Index, which was three points lower than expected by patients (P <.001). Conclusions: Oncology patients and cancer rehabilitation providers significantly overestimate functional goals for acute inpatient rehabilitation. This overestimation was clinically significant for oncology patients and statistically but not clinically significant for cancer rehabilitation providers. Increased communication may allow for a more realistic expectation of functional status upon discharge.
AB - Background: Cancer rehabilitation is a valued resource for patients and oncologists. Cancer rehabilitation providers are seeing increasing numbers of referrals for inpatient rehabilitation as the number of cancer survivors grows. However, cancer rehabilitation providers, oncologists, therapists, patients, and caregivers may not always clearly communicate the goals of care, which can lead to different expectations for inpatient rehabilitation. Objective: To determine the difference in expectations of function after an acute inpatient rehabilitation stay between cancer patients and cancer rehabilitation providers and how they align with achieved goals after treatment. Design: Prospective survey study. Setting: Quaternary academic medical center inpatient rehabilitation unit. Participants: Out of 194 eligible patients, 132 were enrolled and completed admission surveys, and 110 completed the discharge survey. Twelve cancer rehabilitation providers completed the surveys. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Barthel Index. Results: Patients estimated their expected functional status as a median (interquartile range) score of 19 points (18, 20) using the Barthel Index, compared to cancer rehabilitation providers, who estimated a median score of 17 points (15, 19) (P <.001). Actual functional status upon discharge was a median score of 16 points (13, 18) using the Barthel Index, which was three points lower than expected by patients (P <.001). Conclusions: Oncology patients and cancer rehabilitation providers significantly overestimate functional goals for acute inpatient rehabilitation. This overestimation was clinically significant for oncology patients and statistically but not clinically significant for cancer rehabilitation providers. Increased communication may allow for a more realistic expectation of functional status upon discharge.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85092189931&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85092189931&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/pmrj.12473
DO - 10.1002/pmrj.12473
M3 - Article
C2 - 33470547
AN - SCOPUS:85092189931
SN - 1934-1482
VL - 13
SP - 729
EP - 736
JO - PM and R
JF - PM and R
IS - 7
ER -