Clinical validity of a gene expression signature in diagnostically uncertain neoplasms

Loren E. Clarke, Brent Mabey, Darl D. Flake, Stephanie Meek, David S. Cassarino, Lyn M. Duncan, Whitney A. High, Karl M. Napekoski, Victor G. Prieto, Michael T. Tetzlaff, Patricia Vitale, David E. Elder

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Aim: Evaluate the accuracy of a 23-gene expression signature in differentiating benign nevi from melanoma by comparing test results with clinical outcomes. Materials & methods: Seven dermatopathologists blinded to gene expression test results and clinical outcomes examined 181 lesions to identify diagnostically uncertain cases. Participants independently recorded diagnoses and responses to questions quantifying diagnostic certainty. Test accuracy was determined through comparison with clinical outcomes (sensitivity and percent negative agreement). Results: Overall, 125 cases fulfilled criteria for diagnostic uncertainty (69.1%; 95% CI: 61.8-75.7%). Test sensitivity and percent negative agreement in these cases were 90.4% (95% CI: 79.0-96.8%) and 95.5% (95% CI: 87.3-99.1%), respectively. Conclusion: The 23-gene expression signature has high diagnostic accuracy in diagnostically uncertain cases when evaluated against clinical outcomes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)361-371
Number of pages11
JournalPersonalized Medicine
Volume17
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2020

Keywords

  • adjunctive diagnostic test
  • benign nevi
  • diagnostically uncertain
  • gene expression
  • melanocytic
  • melanoma
  • myPath melanoma

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Molecular Medicine
  • Pharmacology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical validity of a gene expression signature in diagnostically uncertain neoplasms'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this