TY - JOUR
T1 - Combination therapy with topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab improves progression-free survival in patients with recurrent high-grade neuroendocrine cervical cancer
T2 - a Neuroendocrine Cervical Tumor Registry (NeCTuR) study
AU - Frumovitz, Michael
AU - Chisholm, Gary B.
AU - Jhingran, Anuja
AU - Ramalingam, Preetha
AU - Flores-Legarreta, Alejandra
AU - Bhosale, Priya
AU - Gonzales, Naomi R.
AU - Hillman, R. Tyler
AU - Salvo, Gloria
N1 - Funding Information:
This study was supported by the National Cancer Institute under award number P30CA016672, which supports the MD Anderson Cancer Center Clinical Trials Office, and by Small/Large Cell Carcinoma of the Cervix: Sisters United.
Funding Information:
M.F. is a consultant and speaker for Stryker and receives research funding from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, and AkesoBio. The other authors report no conflict of interest.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2023/4
Y1 - 2023/4
N2 - Background: Recurrent high-grade neuroendocrine cervical cancer has a very poor prognosis and limited active treatment options. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the 3-drug regimen of topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab in women with recurrent high-grade neuroendocrine cervical cancer. Study Design: This retrospective cohort study used data from the Neuroendocrine Cervical Tumor Registry (NeCTuR), which include data abstracted directly from medical records of women diagnosed with high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix from English- and Spanish-speaking countries. The study compared women with recurrent high-grade neuroendocrine cervical cancer who received the topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab regimen as first- or second-line therapy for recurrence and women with recurrent high-grade neuroendocrine cervical cancer who received chemotherapy but not the topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab regimen. Patients continued chemotherapy until disease progression or the development of unacceptable toxic effects. Progression-free survival from the start of therapy for recurrence to the next recurrence or death, overall survival from the first recurrence, and response rates were evaluated. Results: The study included 62 patients who received the topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab regimen as first- or second-line therapy for recurrence and 56 patients who received chemotherapy but not the topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab regimen for recurrence. The median progression-free survival rates were 8.7 months in the topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab regimen group and 3.7 months in the non–topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab regimen group, with a hazard ratio for disease progression of 0.27 (95% confidence interval, 0.17–0.48; P<.0001). In the topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab regimen group, 15% of patients had stable disease, 39% of patients had a partial response, and 18% of patients had a complete response. Compared with patients in the non–topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab regimen group, significantly more patients in the topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab regimen group remained on treatment at 6 months (31% vs 67%, respectively; P=.0004) and 1 year (9% vs 24%, respectively; P=.02). The median overall survival rates were 16.8 months in the topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab regimen group and 14.0 months in the non–topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab regimen group, with a hazard ratio for death of 0.87 (95% confidence interval, 0.55–1.37). Conclusion: Combination therapy with topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab was an active regimen in women with recurrent high-grade neuroendocrine cervical cancer and improved progression-free survival while decreasing the hazard ratio for disease progression.
AB - Background: Recurrent high-grade neuroendocrine cervical cancer has a very poor prognosis and limited active treatment options. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the 3-drug regimen of topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab in women with recurrent high-grade neuroendocrine cervical cancer. Study Design: This retrospective cohort study used data from the Neuroendocrine Cervical Tumor Registry (NeCTuR), which include data abstracted directly from medical records of women diagnosed with high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix from English- and Spanish-speaking countries. The study compared women with recurrent high-grade neuroendocrine cervical cancer who received the topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab regimen as first- or second-line therapy for recurrence and women with recurrent high-grade neuroendocrine cervical cancer who received chemotherapy but not the topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab regimen. Patients continued chemotherapy until disease progression or the development of unacceptable toxic effects. Progression-free survival from the start of therapy for recurrence to the next recurrence or death, overall survival from the first recurrence, and response rates were evaluated. Results: The study included 62 patients who received the topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab regimen as first- or second-line therapy for recurrence and 56 patients who received chemotherapy but not the topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab regimen for recurrence. The median progression-free survival rates were 8.7 months in the topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab regimen group and 3.7 months in the non–topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab regimen group, with a hazard ratio for disease progression of 0.27 (95% confidence interval, 0.17–0.48; P<.0001). In the topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab regimen group, 15% of patients had stable disease, 39% of patients had a partial response, and 18% of patients had a complete response. Compared with patients in the non–topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab regimen group, significantly more patients in the topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab regimen group remained on treatment at 6 months (31% vs 67%, respectively; P=.0004) and 1 year (9% vs 24%, respectively; P=.02). The median overall survival rates were 16.8 months in the topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab regimen group and 14.0 months in the non–topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab regimen group, with a hazard ratio for death of 0.87 (95% confidence interval, 0.55–1.37). Conclusion: Combination therapy with topotecan, paclitaxel, and bevacizumab was an active regimen in women with recurrent high-grade neuroendocrine cervical cancer and improved progression-free survival while decreasing the hazard ratio for disease progression.
KW - cervical cancer
KW - chemotherapy
KW - high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma
KW - paclitaxel
KW - small-cell carcinoma
KW - topotecan
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85146012462&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85146012462&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.12.009
DO - 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.12.009
M3 - Article
C2 - 36516952
AN - SCOPUS:85146012462
SN - 0002-9378
VL - 228
SP - 445.e1-445.e8
JO - American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
JF - American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
IS - 4
ER -