TY - JOUR
T1 - Computed Tomography Colonography
T2 - Feasibility of Computer-Aided Polyp Detection in a "First Reader" Paradigm
AU - Mani, Aravind
AU - Napel, Sandy
AU - Paik, David S.
AU - Jeffrey, R. Brooke
AU - Yee, Judy
AU - Olcott, Eric W.
AU - Prokesch, Rupert
AU - Davila, Marta
AU - Schraedley-Desmond, Pamela
AU - Beaulieu, Christopher F.
PY - 2004
Y1 - 2004
N2 - Objective: To determine the feasibility of a computer-aided detection (CAD) algorithm as the "first reader" in computed tomography colonography (CTC). Methods: In phase 1 of a 2-part blind trial, we measured the performance of 3 radiologists reading 41 CTC studies without CAD. In phase 2, readers interpreted the same cases using a CAD list of 30 potential polyps. Results: Unassisted readers detected, on average, 63% of polyps ≥ 10 mm in diameter. Using CAD, the sensitivity was 74% (not statistically different). Per-patient analysis showed a trend toward increased sensitivity for polyps ≥10 mm in diameter, from 73% to 90% with CAD (not significant) without decreasing specificity. Computer-aided detection significantly decreased interobserver variability (P = 0.017). Average time to detection of the first polyp decreased significantly with CAD, whereas total reading case reading time was unchanged. Conclusion: Computer-aided detection as a first reader in CTC was associated with similar per-polyp and per-patient detection sensitivity to unassisted reading. Computer-aided detection decreased interobserver variability and reduced the time required to detect the first polyp.
AB - Objective: To determine the feasibility of a computer-aided detection (CAD) algorithm as the "first reader" in computed tomography colonography (CTC). Methods: In phase 1 of a 2-part blind trial, we measured the performance of 3 radiologists reading 41 CTC studies without CAD. In phase 2, readers interpreted the same cases using a CAD list of 30 potential polyps. Results: Unassisted readers detected, on average, 63% of polyps ≥ 10 mm in diameter. Using CAD, the sensitivity was 74% (not statistically different). Per-patient analysis showed a trend toward increased sensitivity for polyps ≥10 mm in diameter, from 73% to 90% with CAD (not significant) without decreasing specificity. Computer-aided detection significantly decreased interobserver variability (P = 0.017). Average time to detection of the first polyp decreased significantly with CAD, whereas total reading case reading time was unchanged. Conclusion: Computer-aided detection as a first reader in CTC was associated with similar per-polyp and per-patient detection sensitivity to unassisted reading. Computer-aided detection decreased interobserver variability and reduced the time required to detect the first polyp.
KW - Colon
KW - Computed tomography colonography
KW - Computer-aided diagnosis
KW - Interpretation accuracy
KW - Interpretation efficiency
KW - Polyps
KW - Virtual colonoscopy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=2342549663&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=2342549663&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/00004728-200405000-00003
DO - 10.1097/00004728-200405000-00003
M3 - Article
C2 - 15100534
AN - SCOPUS:2342549663
SN - 0363-8715
VL - 28
SP - 318
EP - 326
JO - Journal of computer assisted tomography
JF - Journal of computer assisted tomography
IS - 3
ER -