TY - JOUR
T1 - Correction to
T2 - Plasmonic nano-aperture label-free imaging of single small extracellular vesicles for cancer detection (Communications Medicine, (2024), 4, 1, (100), 10.1038/s43856-024-00514-x)
AU - Ohannesian, Nareg
AU - Mallick, Mohammad Sadman
AU - He, Jianzhong
AU - Qiao, Yawei
AU - Li, Nan
AU - Shaitelman, Simona F.
AU - Tang, Chad
AU - Shinn, Eileen H.
AU - Hofstetter, Wayne L.
AU - Goltsov, Alexei
AU - Hassan, Manal M.
AU - Hunt, Kelly K.
AU - Lin, Steven H.
AU - Shih, Wei Chuan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024.
PY - 2024/12
Y1 - 2024/12
N2 - Correction to: Communications Medicinehttps://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-024-00514-x, published online 25 May 2024 In the original version of this article, there was an error in the Results and discussion section, which read ‘Using a cutoff of 70 (3.5 ASC/µl), the post-wash sEV counts for all CPP samples (N = 205) were above this threshold except for one sample, and for HDP samples (N = 106), all but three were above this cutoff, giving a cancer detection sensitivity of 99.5% and specificity of 97.3%.’ The correct version of this sentence is ‘Using a cutoff of 70 (3.5 ASC/µl), the post-wash sEV counts for all CPP samples (N = 205) were above this threshold except for one sample, and for HDP samples (N = 106), all but three were below this cutoff, giving a cancer detection sensitivity of 99.5% and specificity of 97.3%.’ This correction has now been made in the HTML and PDF versions of the article.
AB - Correction to: Communications Medicinehttps://doi.org/10.1038/s43856-024-00514-x, published online 25 May 2024 In the original version of this article, there was an error in the Results and discussion section, which read ‘Using a cutoff of 70 (3.5 ASC/µl), the post-wash sEV counts for all CPP samples (N = 205) were above this threshold except for one sample, and for HDP samples (N = 106), all but three were above this cutoff, giving a cancer detection sensitivity of 99.5% and specificity of 97.3%.’ The correct version of this sentence is ‘Using a cutoff of 70 (3.5 ASC/µl), the post-wash sEV counts for all CPP samples (N = 205) were above this threshold except for one sample, and for HDP samples (N = 106), all but three were below this cutoff, giving a cancer detection sensitivity of 99.5% and specificity of 97.3%.’ This correction has now been made in the HTML and PDF versions of the article.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85203672128&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85203672128&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s43856-024-00551-6
DO - 10.1038/s43856-024-00551-6
M3 - Comment/debate
AN - SCOPUS:85203672128
SN - 2730-664X
VL - 4
JO - Communications Medicine
JF - Communications Medicine
IS - 1
M1 - 126
ER -