TY - JOUR
T1 - Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Translation of the Neck Dissection Impairment Index (NDII) into Spanish
AU - Vargas, Lismelia
AU - Langlie, Jake
AU - McGee, Christie
AU - Ma, Ruixuan
AU - Perdigon, Olivia
AU - Lai, Stephen Y.
AU - Chepeha, Douglas
AU - Civantos, Francisco J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
PY - 2025/1/1
Y1 - 2025/1/1
N2 - Importance: Selective, modified radical, and radical neck dissections are common surgical procedures that can result in significant musculoskeletal issues of the neck and shoulder. Quality-of-life evaluations after neck dissection must assess and quantify these dysfunctions to allow subsequent comparison of outcomes after different treatments. Objective: There is no validated Spanish-language questionnaire designed to evaluate neck and shoulder dysfunction after cervical lymphadenectomy. We therefore sought to translate a version of the Neck Dissection Impairment Index (NDII) into Spanish. Design, Settings, and Participants: A three-phased approach was used. Phase 1: The NDII was translated from English to Spanish using a “forward and backward” translational technique following international guidelines. Phase 2: The questionnaire was administered to six patients from our head and neck surgery clinic who were bilingual and fluent in both English and Spanish. Phase 3: The final version was administered prospectively to 34 patients with prior history of neck dissection (ND). These patients were asked to complete the questionnaire a second time 3 to 6 weeks after their first response. Test–retest reliability was calculated with Spearman’s correlation. Internal consistency was elicited using Cronbach’s alpha. Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s): NDII score at initial administration and follow-up administration 6 weeks later, demographic data. Results: NDII was successfully translated and validated into Spanish. Cronbach’s alpha revealed high internal consistency at both the first time point 0.95 (mean standardized score: 95 (88.1, 97.5), 95% CI: 0.89, 0.97) and at the second time point 0.90 (mean standardized score: 92.5 (80.6, 100.0), 95% CI: 0.81, 0.95). The Spearman’s correlation for test–retest reliability of overall score was strong (rho = 0.772, P < 0.001). The intraclass correlation coefficient of the overall score was moderate (ICC = 0.683, P < 0.001). Conclusions and Relevance: NDII is a recognized, previously validated quality-of-life (QOL) tool for the identification of ND-related dysfunction. This validated Spanish version will allow clinicians to adequately assess the neck and shoulder-related QOL for the Spanish-speaking population who are under-represented in head and neck research.
AB - Importance: Selective, modified radical, and radical neck dissections are common surgical procedures that can result in significant musculoskeletal issues of the neck and shoulder. Quality-of-life evaluations after neck dissection must assess and quantify these dysfunctions to allow subsequent comparison of outcomes after different treatments. Objective: There is no validated Spanish-language questionnaire designed to evaluate neck and shoulder dysfunction after cervical lymphadenectomy. We therefore sought to translate a version of the Neck Dissection Impairment Index (NDII) into Spanish. Design, Settings, and Participants: A three-phased approach was used. Phase 1: The NDII was translated from English to Spanish using a “forward and backward” translational technique following international guidelines. Phase 2: The questionnaire was administered to six patients from our head and neck surgery clinic who were bilingual and fluent in both English and Spanish. Phase 3: The final version was administered prospectively to 34 patients with prior history of neck dissection (ND). These patients were asked to complete the questionnaire a second time 3 to 6 weeks after their first response. Test–retest reliability was calculated with Spearman’s correlation. Internal consistency was elicited using Cronbach’s alpha. Main Outcome(s) and Measure(s): NDII score at initial administration and follow-up administration 6 weeks later, demographic data. Results: NDII was successfully translated and validated into Spanish. Cronbach’s alpha revealed high internal consistency at both the first time point 0.95 (mean standardized score: 95 (88.1, 97.5), 95% CI: 0.89, 0.97) and at the second time point 0.90 (mean standardized score: 92.5 (80.6, 100.0), 95% CI: 0.81, 0.95). The Spearman’s correlation for test–retest reliability of overall score was strong (rho = 0.772, P < 0.001). The intraclass correlation coefficient of the overall score was moderate (ICC = 0.683, P < 0.001). Conclusions and Relevance: NDII is a recognized, previously validated quality-of-life (QOL) tool for the identification of ND-related dysfunction. This validated Spanish version will allow clinicians to adequately assess the neck and shoulder-related QOL for the Spanish-speaking population who are under-represented in head and neck research.
KW - head and neck surgery
KW - neck dissection impairment index
KW - quality improvement
KW - quality of life
KW - Spanish
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105000201288
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105000201288#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1177/19160216251321457
DO - 10.1177/19160216251321457
M3 - Article
C2 - 40071635
AN - SCOPUS:105000201288
SN - 1916-0208
VL - 54
JO - Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
JF - Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
ER -