Differences in Provider Beliefs and Delivery of the 5As for Cigarette and Non-Cigarette Tobacco Use Between Two Types of Healthcare Centers Serving Rural and/or Medically Underserved Areas of Texas, US

Ammar D. Siddiqi, Brian J. Carter, Maggie Britton, Tzuan A. Chen, Isabel Martinez Leal, Asfand B. Moosa, Teresa Williams, Kathleen Casey, Hector Sanchez, Lorraine R. Reitzel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Rural populations in the US bear a disproportionate burden of cancer mortality, which may be partly due to their elevated tobacco use and the limited receipt of tobacco use interventions in rural healthcare settings. Here, we examine providers’ use of the 5As (Ask, Advise, Assess, Assist, and Arrange), a brief tobacco cessation intervention, with their patients to assess intervention gaps. Methods: Provider practices in substance use treatment centers (SUTCs) and medical healthcare centers (MHCs), each serving rural and/or medically underserved areas (MUAs) of Texas, were compared. In total, 347 providers from 10 SUTCs (n = 174) and 9 MHCs (n = 173) responded to an anonymized survey about their cigarette and non-cigarette screening and intervention delivery, along with their perceived importance and workforce’s preparedness to help patients stop using tobacco. Linear mixed and generalized linear mixed models were used to assess differences between practices at SUTCs and MHCs. Results: More MHC than SUTC providers reported that cigarette and non-cigarette tobacco use cessation intervention were (respectively) important parts of their job (p = 0.0009; p = 0.0023) and that their workforce was prepared to help their patients quit tobacco (p = 0.0275), although less than half of all respondents endorsed preparedness. Relative to those at SUTCs, MHC providers reported higher rates of asking (SUTCs = 59.57% and MHCs = 77.21%; p = 0.0182) and advising (SUTCs = 45.34% and MHCs = 72.35%; p = 0.0017) their patients to quit cigarette smoking and advising them to quit non-cigarette tobacco products (SUTCs = 43.94% and MHCs = 71.76%; p = 0.0016). Conclusions: Overall, providers in both settings may benefit from greater preparation to deliver tobacco cessation care; needs were more prevalent within SUTCs than MHCs. Our findings can inform strategic planning to improve centers’ capacity to comprehensively address their patients’ tobacco use in rural/MUAs of Texas, US.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number338
JournalHealthcare (Switzerland)
Volume13
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2025

Keywords

  • 5As
  • cancer prevention
  • cigarettes
  • medical healthcare centers
  • medically underserved
  • non-cigarette tobacco
  • rural
  • substance use treatment center
  • tobacco intervention
  • tobacco use disparities

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Leadership and Management
  • Health Policy
  • Health Informatics
  • Health Information Management

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Differences in Provider Beliefs and Delivery of the 5As for Cigarette and Non-Cigarette Tobacco Use Between Two Types of Healthcare Centers Serving Rural and/or Medically Underserved Areas of Texas, US'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this