Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Drain Management Following Distal Pancreatectomy: Characterization of Contemporary Practice and Impact of Early Removal

  • Thomas F. Seykora
  • , Jason B. Liu
  • , Laura Maggino
  • , Henry A. Pitt
  • , Charles M. Vollmer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objective:To explore contemporary drain management practices and examine the impact of early removal following distal pancreatectomy (DP).Background:Despite accruing evidence supporting its benefit following pancreatoduodenectomy, early drain removal after DP has yet to be explored.Methods:The American College of Surgeons' National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) was queried for elective DPs from 2014 to 2017. When possible, data were linked to survey responses regarding drain management from hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgeons in the ACS-NSQIP HPB Collaborative conducted in 2017. The independent association between timing of drain removal and patients' outcomes was investigated through multivariable analyses and propensity-score matching.Results:Of 5581 DPs identified, 4708 (84.4%) patients received intraoperative drains and early removal (≤ POD3) was performed in 716 (15.2%). Drain fluid amylase was recorded on POD1 for 1285 (27.3%) patients who received drains. The overall rates of death or serious morbidity (DSM) and clinically-relevant fistula (CR-POPF) were 19.5% and 17.0%. Early removal demonstrated significantly better outcomes when compared to late removal and no drain placement for: DSM, CR-POPF, delayed gastric emptying, percutaneous drainage, length of stay, and readmission. On multivariable analysis, early removal demonstrated reduced odds of developing DSM (OR = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.26-0.65) and CR-POPF (OR = 0.33, 95% CI = 0.18-0.61) compared to no drain placement, while late removal displayed increased odds for CR-POPF (OR = 2.15, 95% CI = 1.27-3.61) when compared to no drain placement. After propensity-score matching, early removal was associated with reduced odds for CR-POPF (OR = 0.35, 95% CI = 0.17-0.73).Conclusion:Although not yet widely implemented, early drain removal after distal pancreatectomy is associated with better outcomes. This study demonstrates the potential benefits of early removal and provides a substrate to define best practices and improve the quality of care for DP.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1110-1117
Number of pages8
JournalAnnals of surgery
Volume272
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2020
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • distal pancreatectomy
  • drain amylase
  • drain management
  • early drain removal
  • pancreatic fistula

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Drain Management Following Distal Pancreatectomy: Characterization of Contemporary Practice and Impact of Early Removal'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this