TY - JOUR
T1 - Efficacy of topical treatments for high-risk human papillomavirus in preventing CIN II+ lesions
T2 - a systematic review
AU - Pareja, Rene
AU - Agustí, Núria
AU - Vieira, Santiago
AU - Mora-Soto, Nathalia
AU - Sanchez, Emmanuel
AU - Fernandes, Andreína
AU - Aristizábal, Beatriz
AU - Heredia, Fernando
AU - Levin, Gabriel
AU - Varon, Melissa Lopez
AU - Pontremoli Salcedo, Mila
AU - Krause, Kate J.
AU - Abu-Rustum, Nadeem R.
AU - Huh, Warner
AU - Rauh-Hain, J. Alejandro
AU - Viveros-Carreño, David
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 European Society of Gynaecological Oncology and the International Gynecologic Cancer Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.
PY - 2026/4
Y1 - 2026/4
N2 - ObjectiveThis study aimed to systematically review the literature regarding topical therapies for reducing the risk of cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 2 or higher (CIN II+) lesions among women with high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and histologically confirmed CIN I or either no cervical lesions.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and registered the protocol in PROSPERO (CRD42024629608). We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, Cochrane Central, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception through December 16, 2024 for randomized controlled trials evaluating any cervical topical treatment in women with high-risk HPV and, at most, CIN I. The primary outcome was progression to histologically confirmed CIN II+. Secondary outcomes were treatment-related adverse events.ResultsOf 305 records, 19 full-text articles were reviewed. Finally, 16 trials were assessed. None met all our eligibility criteria, with some trials being excluded for multiple reasons. Twelve were excluded due to an inadequate study population (included women with CIN II+, lacked histologic confirmation of lesion grade, or lacked confirmatory high-risk HPV testing), 4 used inappropriate interventions, and 2 did not include a placebo or watchful waiting comparator. Although many studies reported HPV clearance or cytologic regression, none were powered or designed to assess progression to CIN II+.ConclusionsThe current evidence from randomized trials is insufficient to determine whether topical cervical therapies reduce the risk of progression to CIN II+ in women with high-risk HPV infection. Future trials should prioritize histologic outcomes and adhere to current management protocols to establish the clinical utility of such therapies.
AB - ObjectiveThis study aimed to systematically review the literature regarding topical therapies for reducing the risk of cervical intra-epithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 2 or higher (CIN II+) lesions among women with high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and histologically confirmed CIN I or either no cervical lesions.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines and registered the protocol in PROSPERO (CRD42024629608). We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid EMBASE, Cochrane Central, and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception through December 16, 2024 for randomized controlled trials evaluating any cervical topical treatment in women with high-risk HPV and, at most, CIN I. The primary outcome was progression to histologically confirmed CIN II+. Secondary outcomes were treatment-related adverse events.ResultsOf 305 records, 19 full-text articles were reviewed. Finally, 16 trials were assessed. None met all our eligibility criteria, with some trials being excluded for multiple reasons. Twelve were excluded due to an inadequate study population (included women with CIN II+, lacked histologic confirmation of lesion grade, or lacked confirmatory high-risk HPV testing), 4 used inappropriate interventions, and 2 did not include a placebo or watchful waiting comparator. Although many studies reported HPV clearance or cytologic regression, none were powered or designed to assess progression to CIN II+.ConclusionsThe current evidence from randomized trials is insufficient to determine whether topical cervical therapies reduce the risk of progression to CIN II+ in women with high-risk HPV infection. Future trials should prioritize histologic outcomes and adhere to current management protocols to establish the clinical utility of such therapies.
KW - Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia
KW - Cervical Neoplasia Progression
KW - High-Risk Human Papillomavirus
KW - Systematic Review
KW - Topical Treatment
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105034802553
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105034802553#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.102729
DO - 10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.102729
M3 - Article
C2 - 41951281
AN - SCOPUS:105034802553
SN - 1048-891X
VL - 36
JO - International Journal of Gynecological Cancer
JF - International Journal of Gynecological Cancer
IS - 4
M1 - 102729
ER -