TY - JOUR
T1 - Erratum
T2 - Endothelial p130cas confers resistance to anti-angiogenesis therapy (Cell Reports (2022) 38(4), (S2211124722000134), (10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110301))
AU - Wen, Yunfei
AU - Chelariu-Raicu, Anca
AU - Umamaheswaran, Sujanitha
AU - Nick, Alpa M.
AU - Stur, Elaine
AU - Hanjra, Pahul
AU - Jiang, Dahai
AU - Jennings, Nicholas B.
AU - Chen, Xiuhui
AU - Corvigno, Sara
AU - Glassman, Deanna
AU - Lopez-Berestein, Gabriel
AU - Liu, Jinsong
AU - Hung, Mien Chie
AU - Sood, Anil K.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 The Author(s)
PY - 2022/6/21
Y1 - 2022/6/21
N2 - (Cell Reports 38, 110301; January 25, 2022) In the original version of the article that was published with the January 25, 2022 issue, there were inadvertent errors introduced during figure assembly in Figures 2, 4, and 5. The original Figure 2H contained an inversion of the first two images in the upper panel, the original Figure 4D contained duplicated Hoechst and VEGFR2 images in row 1 and row 2 as well as a duplicated cell cluster in row 3, and the original Figure 5A contained duplicated animal images in day 35 (first group, positions 1 and 3) and day 50 (second group, positions 2 and 3). The correct images for each case have been located, and the correct versions of the figures now appear online with the article; these errors did not affect the scientific conclusions drawn from the figures. The authors sincerely regret the errors and any confusion they may have caused.[Formula
AB - (Cell Reports 38, 110301; January 25, 2022) In the original version of the article that was published with the January 25, 2022 issue, there were inadvertent errors introduced during figure assembly in Figures 2, 4, and 5. The original Figure 2H contained an inversion of the first two images in the upper panel, the original Figure 4D contained duplicated Hoechst and VEGFR2 images in row 1 and row 2 as well as a duplicated cell cluster in row 3, and the original Figure 5A contained duplicated animal images in day 35 (first group, positions 1 and 3) and day 50 (second group, positions 2 and 3). The correct images for each case have been located, and the correct versions of the figures now appear online with the article; these errors did not affect the scientific conclusions drawn from the figures. The authors sincerely regret the errors and any confusion they may have caused.[Formula
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85132633310&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85132633310&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110999
DO - 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.110999
M3 - Comment/debate
C2 - 35732127
AN - SCOPUS:85132633310
SN - 2211-1247
VL - 39
JO - Cell Reports
JF - Cell Reports
IS - 12
M1 - 110999
ER -