Esophageal cancer: Is the CROSS strategy ready for history books?

Matheus De Silva Sewastjanow, Jane E. Rogers, Wayne L. Hofstetter, Jaffer A. Ajani

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorialpeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

The CROSS trial group deserves enormous credit for completing a well-powered randomized trial that has established the CROSS strategy as a standard of care for patients with potentially resectable esophageal cancer. However, the 10-year results are rather disappointing with only 38% of all patients treated with the CROSS strategy cured compared with approximately 25% who had surgery alone. Another standard, perioperative chemotherapy has produced similar disappointing results as the CROSS strategy. Although many of us are consumed by the question as to which option is better for our patients, we conclude that both strategies produce only marginal benefits. We should have better treatment options. The timing may be opportune to reflect on how to develop novel and rational strategies rather than propagate the historical empiric approaches.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)901-905
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
Volume165
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2023

Keywords

  • CROSS
  • esophageal cancer
  • localized
  • trial

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Esophageal cancer: Is the CROSS strategy ready for history books?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this