Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Evidence for involvement of the putative first extracellular loop in differential volume sensitivity of the Na+/H+ exchangers NHE1 and NHE2

  • Xiaohua Su
  • , Tianxiang Pang
  • , Shigeo Wakabayashi
  • , Munekazu Shigekawa

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

We studied hyperosmolarity-induced changes in cell volume and cytoplasmic pH in PS120 cells expressing Na+/H+ exchanger (NHE) isoforms and their mutants. Change in cell volume was estimated by measuring change in cell height by means of confocal microscopy. Regulatory volume increase (RVI) and cytoplasmic alkalinization were observed in cells expressing NHE1 but not in cells expressing NHE2 or NHE3. Studies using chimeric exchangers revealed that the membrane domain of the exchanger is responsible for the difference in volume sensitivity between NHE1 and NHE2. Although deletion or point mutation within the first extracellular loop of NHE1 did not affect RVI and alkalinization, point mutations within the corresponding region of NHE2, particularly a region containing aa 41-53, as well as replacement of the N-terminus of NHE2 with the corresponding region of NHE1, rendered NHE2 responsive to the activating effect of cell shrinkage. Thus, the membrane domain plays an important role in the response of the exchanger to cell shrinkage. The data suggest that the putative first extracellular loop of NHE2, but not that of NHE1, may exert an inhibitory influence on hyperosmolarity-induced activation of the exchanger and thereby block RVI.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1086-1094
Number of pages9
JournalBiochemistry
Volume42
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 4 2003
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Biochemistry

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evidence for involvement of the putative first extracellular loop in differential volume sensitivity of the Na+/H+ exchangers NHE1 and NHE2'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this