TY - JOUR
T1 - First-Line MET Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors versus Immunotherapy ± Chemotherapy for Patients with MET Exon 14 Skipping Mutant Metastatic NSCLC
AU - Pecci, Federica
AU - Li, Hui
AU - Di Federico, Alessandro
AU - Wu, Jia
AU - Chen, Hong
AU - Gariazzo, Eleonora
AU - Mantuano, Francesco
AU - Garbo, Edoardo
AU - Aldea, Mihaela
AU - Santo, Valentina
AU - Gibbons, Don
AU - Tran, Hai
AU - Paoloni, Francesco
AU - De Almeida, Guilherme Rossato
AU - Metro, Giulio
AU - De Giglio, Andrea
AU - Gelsomino, Francesco
AU - Wang, Xinan
AU - Tiseo, Marcello
AU - Rotow, Julia
AU - Ardizzoni, Andrea
AU - Lee, J. Jack
AU - Awad, Mark M.
AU - Addeo, Alfredo
AU - Hong, Lingzhi
AU - Negrao, Marcelo V.
AU - Jänne, Pasi A.
AU - Heymach, John V.
AU - Zhang, Jianjun
AU - Ricciuti, Biagio
AU - Le, Xiuning
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.
PY - 2025/11/15
Y1 - 2025/11/15
N2 - Purpose: First-line treatment options for MET exon 14 skipping– mutant metastatic non–small cell lung cancer vary because of differences in drug approvals and clinical experience. This study investigates factors influencing outcomes with first-line MET tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) versus immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) ± chemotherapy. Experimental Design: Clinicopathologic data were collected from patients with metastatic MET exon 14 skipping–mutant non–small cell lung cancer treated with first-line MET TKI or ICI ± chemotherapy at five centers. Primary endpoints were real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) and overall survival (OS) to first-line MET TKI versus ICI ± chemotherapy. Subgroup analyses by clinical and tumor characteristics were performed. Results: Among 158 patients, 80 received MET TKI and 78 received ICI ± chemotherapy as first-line treatment. Baseline clinicopathologic features were balanced except for a higher proportion of patients with a history of smoking in the ICI ± chemotherapy group (P = 0.03). With a median follow-up of 37.9 months, no difference was observed in rwPFS (HR, 0.85; P = 0.4) or OS (HR, 0.97; P = 0.9) with first-line MET TKI versus ICI ± chemotherapy. In subgroup analyses, first-line ICI ± chemotherapy improved rwPFS in PD-L1 ≥80% (HR, 0.50; P = 0.03), whereas MET TKI improved rwPFS (HR, 0.40; P = 0.005) and OS (HR, 0.49; P = 0.03) in PD-L1 <50%, as well as rwPFS (HR, 0.39; P = 0.02) and OS (HR, 0.36; P = 0.03) in brain metastases and rwPFS (HR, 0.55; P = 0.01) in bone metastases. No significant differences were observed in the incidence of high-grade toxicity (P = 0.9) or rates of permanent treatment discontinuation (P = 0.2) between first-line MET TKI and ICI ± chemotherapy. Conclusions: First-line MET TKI improved outcomes in PDL1 <50% and brain/bone metastases, whereas ICI ± chemotherapy prolonged PFS only in PD-L1 ≥80%, emphasizing the need for personalized treatment selection.
AB - Purpose: First-line treatment options for MET exon 14 skipping– mutant metastatic non–small cell lung cancer vary because of differences in drug approvals and clinical experience. This study investigates factors influencing outcomes with first-line MET tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) versus immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) ± chemotherapy. Experimental Design: Clinicopathologic data were collected from patients with metastatic MET exon 14 skipping–mutant non–small cell lung cancer treated with first-line MET TKI or ICI ± chemotherapy at five centers. Primary endpoints were real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) and overall survival (OS) to first-line MET TKI versus ICI ± chemotherapy. Subgroup analyses by clinical and tumor characteristics were performed. Results: Among 158 patients, 80 received MET TKI and 78 received ICI ± chemotherapy as first-line treatment. Baseline clinicopathologic features were balanced except for a higher proportion of patients with a history of smoking in the ICI ± chemotherapy group (P = 0.03). With a median follow-up of 37.9 months, no difference was observed in rwPFS (HR, 0.85; P = 0.4) or OS (HR, 0.97; P = 0.9) with first-line MET TKI versus ICI ± chemotherapy. In subgroup analyses, first-line ICI ± chemotherapy improved rwPFS in PD-L1 ≥80% (HR, 0.50; P = 0.03), whereas MET TKI improved rwPFS (HR, 0.40; P = 0.005) and OS (HR, 0.49; P = 0.03) in PD-L1 <50%, as well as rwPFS (HR, 0.39; P = 0.02) and OS (HR, 0.36; P = 0.03) in brain metastases and rwPFS (HR, 0.55; P = 0.01) in bone metastases. No significant differences were observed in the incidence of high-grade toxicity (P = 0.9) or rates of permanent treatment discontinuation (P = 0.2) between first-line MET TKI and ICI ± chemotherapy. Conclusions: First-line MET TKI improved outcomes in PDL1 <50% and brain/bone metastases, whereas ICI ± chemotherapy prolonged PFS only in PD-L1 ≥80%, emphasizing the need for personalized treatment selection.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105021869464
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105021869464#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-25-1735
DO - 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-25-1735
M3 - Article
C2 - 40864503
AN - SCOPUS:105021869464
SN - 1078-0432
VL - 31
SP - 4802
EP - 4813
JO - Clinical Cancer Research
JF - Clinical Cancer Research
IS - 22
ER -