Forty-One Million RADPEER Reviews Later: What We Have Learned and Are Still Learning

Humaira Chaudhry; Andrew J. Del Gaizo; L. Alexandre Frigini; Shlomit Goldberg-Stein; Scott D. Long; Zeyad A. Metwalli; Jonathan A. Morgan; Xuan V. Nguyen; Mark S. Parker; Hani Abujudeh

doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2019.12.023

Forty-One Million RADPEER Reviews Later: What We Have Learned and Are Still Learning

Humaira Chaudhry, Andrew J. Del Gaizo, L. Alexandre Frigini, Shlomit Goldberg-Stein, Scott D. Long, Zeyad A. Metwalli, Jonathan A. Morgan, Xuan V. Nguyen, Mark S. Parker, Hani Abujudeh

Interventional Radiology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

ACR RADPEER® is the leading method of radiologic peer review in the United States. The program has evolved since its inception in 2002 and was most recently updated in 2016. In 2018, a survey was sent to RADPEER participants to gauge the current state of the program and explore opportunities for continued improvement. A total of 26 questions were included, and more than 300 practices responded. In this report, the ACR RADPEER Committee authors summarize the survey results and discuss opportunities for future iterations of the RADPEER program.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	779-785
Number of pages	7
Journal	Journal of the American College of Radiology
Volume	17
Issue number	6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2019.12.023
State	Published - Jun 2020

Keywords

RADPEER
diagnostic radiology
peer review
quality improvement

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Access to Document

10.1016/j.jacr.2019.12.023

Cite this

@article{313b24e2f5d54c03b458ec5a6852d9c4,

title = "Forty-One Million RADPEER Reviews Later: What We Have Learned and Are Still Learning",

abstract = "ACR RADPEER{\textregistered} is the leading method of radiologic peer review in the United States. The program has evolved since its inception in 2002 and was most recently updated in 2016. In 2018, a survey was sent to RADPEER participants to gauge the current state of the program and explore opportunities for continued improvement. A total of 26 questions were included, and more than 300 practices responded. In this report, the ACR RADPEER Committee authors summarize the survey results and discuss opportunities for future iterations of the RADPEER program.",

keywords = "RADPEER, diagnostic radiology, peer review, quality improvement",

author = "Humaira Chaudhry and {Del Gaizo}, {Andrew J.} and Frigini, {L. Alexandre} and Shlomit Goldberg-Stein and Long, {Scott D.} and Metwalli, {Zeyad A.} and Morgan, {Jonathan A.} and Nguyen, {Xuan V.} and Parker, {Mark S.} and Hani Abujudeh",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2019 American College of Radiology",

year = "2020",

month = jun,

doi = "10.1016/j.jacr.2019.12.023",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "17",

pages = "779--785",

journal = "Journal of the American College of Radiology",

issn = "1546-1440",

publisher = "Elsevier BV",

number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Forty-One Million RADPEER Reviews Later

T2 - What We Have Learned and Are Still Learning

AU - Chaudhry, Humaira

AU - Del Gaizo, Andrew J.

AU - Frigini, L. Alexandre

AU - Goldberg-Stein, Shlomit

AU - Long, Scott D.

AU - Metwalli, Zeyad A.

AU - Morgan, Jonathan A.

AU - Nguyen, Xuan V.

AU - Parker, Mark S.

AU - Abujudeh, Hani

PY - 2020/6

Y1 - 2020/6

N2 - ACR RADPEER® is the leading method of radiologic peer review in the United States. The program has evolved since its inception in 2002 and was most recently updated in 2016. In 2018, a survey was sent to RADPEER participants to gauge the current state of the program and explore opportunities for continued improvement. A total of 26 questions were included, and more than 300 practices responded. In this report, the ACR RADPEER Committee authors summarize the survey results and discuss opportunities for future iterations of the RADPEER program.

AB - ACR RADPEER® is the leading method of radiologic peer review in the United States. The program has evolved since its inception in 2002 and was most recently updated in 2016. In 2018, a survey was sent to RADPEER participants to gauge the current state of the program and explore opportunities for continued improvement. A total of 26 questions were included, and more than 300 practices responded. In this report, the ACR RADPEER Committee authors summarize the survey results and discuss opportunities for future iterations of the RADPEER program.

KW - RADPEER

KW - diagnostic radiology

KW - peer review

KW - quality improvement

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85080941923&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85080941923&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.12.023

DO - 10.1016/j.jacr.2019.12.023

M3 - Article

C2 - 31991118

AN - SCOPUS:85080941923

SN - 1546-1440

VL - 17

SP - 779

EP - 785

JO - Journal of the American College of Radiology

JF - Journal of the American College of Radiology

IS - 6

ER -

Forty-One Million RADPEER Reviews Later: What We Have Learned and Are Still Learning

Abstract

Keywords

ASJC Scopus subject areas

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this