High-Flow Nasal Cannula Therapy for Exertional Dyspnea in Patients with Cancer: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial

David Hui, Donald A. Mahler, Liliana Larsson, Jimin Wu, Saji Thomas, Carol A. Harrison, Kenneth Hess, Juan Lopez-Mattei, Kara Thompson, Daniel Gomez, Melenda Jeter, Steven Lin, Karen Basen-Engquist, Eduardo Bruera

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Exertional dyspnea is common in patients with cancer and limits their function. The impact of high-flow nasal cannula on exertional dyspnea in nonhypoxemic patients is unclear. In this double-blind, parallel-group, randomized trial, we assessed the effect of flow rate (high vs. low) and gas (oxygen vs. air) on exertional dyspnea in nonhypoxemic patients with cancer. Patients and Methods: Patients with cancer with oxygen saturation >90% at rest and exertion completed incremental and constant work (80% maximal) cycle ergometry while breathing low-flow air at 2 L/minute. They were then randomized to receive high-flow oxygen, high-flow air, low-flow oxygen, or low-flow air while performing symptom-limited endurance cycle ergometry at 80% maximal. The primary outcome was modified 0–10 Borg dyspnea intensity scale at isotime. Secondary outcomes included dyspnea unpleasantness, exercise time, and adverse events. Results: Seventy-four patients were enrolled, and 44 completed the study (mean age 63; 41% female). Compared with low-flow air at baseline, dyspnea intensity was significantly lower at isotime with high-flow oxygen (mean change, −1.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], −2.1, −0.12) and low-flow oxygen (−1.83; 95% CI, −2.7, −0.9), but not high-flow air (−0.2; 95% CI, −0.97, 0.6) or low-flow air (−0.5; 95% CI, −1.3, 0.4). Compared with low-flow air, high-flow oxygen also resulted in significantly longer exercise time (difference + 2.5 minutes, p =.009), but not low-flow oxygen (+0.39 minutes, p =.65) or high-flow air (+0.63 minutes, p =.48). The interventions were well tolerated without significant adverse effects. Conclusion: Our preliminary findings support that high-flow oxygen improved both exertional dyspnea and exercise duration in nonhypoxemic patients with cancer. (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02357134). Implications for Practice: In this four-arm, double-blind, randomized clinical trial examining the role of high-flow nasal cannula on exertional dyspnea in patients with cancer without hypoxemia, high-flow oxygen, but not high-flow air, resulted in significantly lower dyspnea scores and longer exercise time. High-flow oxygen delivered by high-flow nasal cannula devices may improve clinically relevant outcomes even in patients without hypoxemia.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)e1470-e1479
JournalOncologist
Volume26
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2021

Keywords

  • Clinical trial
  • Dyspnea
  • Exercise tolerance
  • Neoplasms
  • Oxygen

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

MD Anderson CCSG core facilities

  • Assessment, Intervention, and Measurement
  • Biostatistics Resource Group

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'High-Flow Nasal Cannula Therapy for Exertional Dyspnea in Patients with Cancer: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this