Histopathologic features predictive of metastasis and survival in 230 patients with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck and non-head and neck locations: a single-center retrospective study

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Staging systems for cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) produce inconsistent risk stratification. Objective: The aim of this study was to identify further prognostic parameters for better stratification. Methods: We retrospectively analysed the prognostic significance of clinicopathologic parameters of 230 patients who underwent primary excision of invasive cSCC of the head and neck (n = 115) and non-head and non-neck (n = 115) locations. In addition to known high-risk features, we analysed tumour nest shape, invasion pattern, lymphoid response pattern and tumour budding. Results: On multivariable analysis, lymphovascular invasion (LVI) and high tumour budding predicted worse disease-specific survival, and ulceration, LVI and high tumour budding predicted worse overall survival. Only ulceration was independently associated with risk of nodal metastasis. Conclusion: High tumour budding, LVI and ulceration are independently associated with poor outcome in cSCC and may be used to refine cSCC prognostic stratification, which is crucial to optimize clinical decision and to identify patients who are more likely to benefit from more aggressive interventions or clinical trials.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1246-1255
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology
Volume36
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2022

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Dermatology
  • Infectious Diseases

MD Anderson CCSG core facilities

  • Biostatistics Resource Group

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Histopathologic features predictive of metastasis and survival in 230 patients with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck and non-head and neck locations: a single-center retrospective study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this