Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Historical control: Design, measures, and classic example

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Abstract

Historical control trials (HCTs) utilize retrospective data on a standard treatment, or observation alone, as a control. Indications for HCTs include disease states where no viable therapeutic alternative exists, and randomizing patients to observation or minimally effective therapy is unethical. While limitations arising from the inability to limiting confounders through randomization exist in HCTs, appropriate use of single-arm studies implementing historical controls has the advantage of treating all patients on trial with active therapy and spurring development and approval of novel therapies. In this chapter, we discuss the limitations of this trial approach, which can be effectively mitigated by carefully defining the disease space, limiting heterogeneity in patient and disease characteristics, and choosing clinically meaningful and reproducible endpoints. We apply these principles to a real-world example in urologic oncology, the BCG-unresponsive nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer space.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationTranslational Urology
Subtitle of host publicationHandbook for Designing and Conducting Clinical and Translational Research
PublisherElsevier
Pages211-215
Number of pages5
ISBN (Electronic)9780323901864
ISBN (Print)9780323901871
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2024

Keywords

  • BCG unresponsive
  • Clinical trial
  • Historical control
  • Nonmuscle invasive bladder cancer
  • Single arm

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General Agricultural and Biological Sciences
  • General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Historical control: Design, measures, and classic example'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this