Abstract
Objective: This study assessed the needs and perspective of (1) couples and (2) spouses/partners when considering fertility preservation after a cancer diagnosis. Research Approach: Semi-structured interviews explored (1) couples’ shared decision-making and (2) spouses’/partners’ individual perspectives. Participants: Twelve female cancer survivors and their partners (spouses or domestic/romantic partners) (n = 24). Methodological Approach: Dyadic and individual interviews were conducted using a Decisional Needs Assessment interview guide. Thematic analysis identified key themes. Findings: Couples reported making fertility preservation decisions like other major decisions, including prioritizing mutual satisfaction. Partners also reported concerns about patients’ health, variable decision-making needs, and letting patients lead. Couples unanimously recommended fertility preservation consultations, and designing resources that provide information and assess needs for both patients and partners. Interpretations: Patients and partners have shared and unique needs when facing fertility preservation decisions. Implications for Psychosocial Providers or Policy: Whenever feasible, psychosocial providers should assess and address couples’ and partners’ fertility preservation decision-making needs.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 268-284 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Journal of Psychosocial Oncology |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2021 |
Keywords
- cancer
- decision making
- decision support techniques
- fertility preservation
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Oncology
- Applied Psychology
- Psychiatry and Mental health
MD Anderson CCSG core facilities
- Shared Decision Making Core
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'How do couples and spouses/partners consider fertility preservation decisions during cancer treatment planning? A qualitative analysis of dyadic decision making'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS