Identifying Effective Mentors in Scientific Communication: A Latent Profile Analysis of Mentor Beliefs

Cheryl B. Anderson, Shine Chang, Hwa Young Lee, Constance D. Baldwin

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

The need to specifically mentor graduate and medical students performing biomedical and biobehavioral research in communication skills is increasingly being highlighted to increase intention to pursue academic research careers, including physician–scientist careers. This study used data collected from 354 research faculty in 33 states across the United States to examine beliefs and perceived barriers about mentoring in scientific communication (writing, presenting, and informal discussion about science), with the goal of advancing evidence-based recommendations for mentoring interventions. Latent profile analysis identified four mentor profiles, based on beliefs regarding mentoring responsibility, expected outcomes, and barriers in scientific communication mentoring. Problem solvers, who acknowledged trainee problems but reported high efficacy in overcoming them, offered the highest levels of supportive and instructive mentoring. Since mentoring messages and actions influence trainee career development significantly, our results have important implications for faculty development to advance effective mentoring, especially in scientific communication.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)251-268
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Career Development
Volume49
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2022

Keywords

  • latent profile analysis
  • mentoring
  • research career
  • scientific communication
  • social cognitive career theory

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Education
  • Applied Psychology
  • General Psychology
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Identifying Effective Mentors in Scientific Communication: A Latent Profile Analysis of Mentor Beliefs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this