TY - JOUR
T1 - Imaging, morphologic, and immunohistochemical correlation in gastrointestinal stromal tumors
AU - Logrono, Roberto
AU - Bhanot, Punam
AU - Chaya, Charles
AU - Cao, Li
AU - Waxman, Irving
AU - Bhutani, Manoop S.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2008 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2006/8/25
Y1 - 2006/8/25
N2 - BACKGROUND. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) recently have been distinguished morphologically, immunohistochemically, and genetically from other gastrointestinal-tract spindle cell neoplasms. The objective of this study was to correlate clinical and imaging findings with morphology and immunohistochemistry to diagnose GISTs and to differentiate them from other spindle cell lesions in the gastrointestinal tract. METHODS. The authors reviewed 9 patients who had tumors that were diagnosed as GIST by image-guided and endosonographic-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) with or without core biopsy (7 stomach tumors and 2 intraabdominal tumors). The male:female ratio was 3:6, and the patients ranged in age from 38 years to 80 years. Onsite evaluation, preliminary cytologic evaluation, and immunohistochemistry were provided for 6 patients. Immunostains were performed, depending on sample size, on aspirates and/or core biopsies. RESULTS. On imaging studies, most tumors were smooth and homogenous, consistent with GIST. Tumors ranged in size from 1.8 cm to 22 cm. The largest neoplasm showed solid/cystic and necrotic components. Aspirates consisted of spindle cell, neoplastic proliferation arranged in fascicles that exhibited focal, nuclear palisading; indistinct, cytoplasmic borders; and no significant atypia or mitosis. Focal epithelioid changes or cytologic atypia and mitoses were observed in 2 tumors. Immunostains revealed tumor expression of CD117 and/or CD34 in 5 of 6 tumors, expression of actin in 3 of 6 tumors, and expression of desmin in 1 of 6 tumors. All tumors were diagnosed as GIST (or consistent with GIST for tumors that lacked immunochemical analysis). Five patients underwent surgical excision, and the GIST diagnosis was confirmed in 3 patients, whereas 1 tumor proved to be neurofibroma, and another tumor was leiomyoma. No surgical follow-up was available for the remaining 4 patients, who had imaging and morphologic findings consistent with GIST. CONCLUSIONS. In the setting of consistent clinical and radiologic findings, the combined use of cytomorphology and immunohistochemistry on FNA and/or core biopsy in most instances provides a reliable pathologic diagnosis of GIST. The need of sufficient material for performing ancillary studies and the usual impossibility of excluding malignancy are limitations of FNA cytology of GIST.
AB - BACKGROUND. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) recently have been distinguished morphologically, immunohistochemically, and genetically from other gastrointestinal-tract spindle cell neoplasms. The objective of this study was to correlate clinical and imaging findings with morphology and immunohistochemistry to diagnose GISTs and to differentiate them from other spindle cell lesions in the gastrointestinal tract. METHODS. The authors reviewed 9 patients who had tumors that were diagnosed as GIST by image-guided and endosonographic-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) with or without core biopsy (7 stomach tumors and 2 intraabdominal tumors). The male:female ratio was 3:6, and the patients ranged in age from 38 years to 80 years. Onsite evaluation, preliminary cytologic evaluation, and immunohistochemistry were provided for 6 patients. Immunostains were performed, depending on sample size, on aspirates and/or core biopsies. RESULTS. On imaging studies, most tumors were smooth and homogenous, consistent with GIST. Tumors ranged in size from 1.8 cm to 22 cm. The largest neoplasm showed solid/cystic and necrotic components. Aspirates consisted of spindle cell, neoplastic proliferation arranged in fascicles that exhibited focal, nuclear palisading; indistinct, cytoplasmic borders; and no significant atypia or mitosis. Focal epithelioid changes or cytologic atypia and mitoses were observed in 2 tumors. Immunostains revealed tumor expression of CD117 and/or CD34 in 5 of 6 tumors, expression of actin in 3 of 6 tumors, and expression of desmin in 1 of 6 tumors. All tumors were diagnosed as GIST (or consistent with GIST for tumors that lacked immunochemical analysis). Five patients underwent surgical excision, and the GIST diagnosis was confirmed in 3 patients, whereas 1 tumor proved to be neurofibroma, and another tumor was leiomyoma. No surgical follow-up was available for the remaining 4 patients, who had imaging and morphologic findings consistent with GIST. CONCLUSIONS. In the setting of consistent clinical and radiologic findings, the combined use of cytomorphology and immunohistochemistry on FNA and/or core biopsy in most instances provides a reliable pathologic diagnosis of GIST. The need of sufficient material for performing ancillary studies and the usual impossibility of excluding malignancy are limitations of FNA cytology of GIST.
KW - Computed tomography
KW - Cytomorphology
KW - Endoscopic ultrasound
KW - Fine needle aspiration
KW - Gastrointestinal stromal tumor
KW - Imaging
KW - Immunohistochemistry
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33748853909&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=33748853909&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/cncr.21918
DO - 10.1002/cncr.21918
M3 - Review article
C2 - 16795074
AN - SCOPUS:33748853909
SN - 0008-543X
VL - 108
SP - 257
EP - 266
JO - Cancer
JF - Cancer
IS - 4
ER -