TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of Artificial Intelligence for Detection of Precancerous Colonic Lesions in a Fecal Immunochemical Blood Test-Based Organized Screening Program in Italy
T2 - A Randomized Control Trial
AU - Spada, Cristiano
AU - Cesaro, Paola
AU - Fuccio, Lorenzo
AU - Salvi, Daniele
AU - Ferrari, Clarissa
AU - Barbaro, Federico
AU - Bizzotto, Alessandra
AU - Butitta, Francesco
AU - Gerardi, Viviana
AU - Lovera, Mauro
AU - Milluzzo, Sebastian Manuel
AU - Minelli Grazioli, Leonardo
AU - Olivari, Nicola
AU - Pecere, Silvia
AU - Piccirelli, Stefania
AU - Pugliano, Cecilia Lina
AU - Pesatori, Eugenia Vittoria
AU - Quadarella, Alessandro
AU - Tettoni, Enrico
AU - Zani, Chiara
AU - Ricciardiello, Luigi
AU - Costamagna, Guido
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 The Author(s). United European Gastroenterology Journal published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of United European Gastroenterology.
PY - 2026/2
Y1 - 2026/2
N2 - Background: The fecal immunochemical test (FIT) is widely implemented as a first-line tool in organized colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs, including Italy. Following a positive FIT, colonoscopy is recommended. Computer-aided detection (CADe) systems have the potential to enhance adenoma detection, particularly in FIT-positive populations where identifying advanced adenomas is critical for cancer prevention. This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of CADe-assisted colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy (SC) in a FIT-based screening cohort. Methods: In this multicenter, randomized controlled trial, patients with a positive FIT result were randomized to undergo either CADe-assisted or standard colonoscopy. The primary endpoint was the advanced adenoma detection rate (AADR). Secondary endpoints included overall adenoma detection rate (ADR), adenomas per colonoscopy (APC), and mean withdrawal time (WT). Results: Of 1077 patients enrolled, 68 were excluded due to inadequate bowel preparation, leaving 1009 patients for analysis (CADe: n = 506; SC: n = 503). AADR was comparable between the groups (21.3% vs. 20.5%, p = 0.794). However, CADe significantly improved ADR (67.6% vs. 59.8%, p = 0.012) and APC (1.82 ± 2.12 vs. 1.34 ± 1.81, p < 0.001). Mean WT was longer in the CADe group (17.10 ± 8.28 min vs. 16.13 ± 8.28 min, p = 0.016). Conclusions: In a FIT-based organized CRC screening setting, CADe did not enhance detection of AADR with a modest increase in withdrawal time. NCT04441580.
AB - Background: The fecal immunochemical test (FIT) is widely implemented as a first-line tool in organized colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programs, including Italy. Following a positive FIT, colonoscopy is recommended. Computer-aided detection (CADe) systems have the potential to enhance adenoma detection, particularly in FIT-positive populations where identifying advanced adenomas is critical for cancer prevention. This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of CADe-assisted colonoscopy versus standard colonoscopy (SC) in a FIT-based screening cohort. Methods: In this multicenter, randomized controlled trial, patients with a positive FIT result were randomized to undergo either CADe-assisted or standard colonoscopy. The primary endpoint was the advanced adenoma detection rate (AADR). Secondary endpoints included overall adenoma detection rate (ADR), adenomas per colonoscopy (APC), and mean withdrawal time (WT). Results: Of 1077 patients enrolled, 68 were excluded due to inadequate bowel preparation, leaving 1009 patients for analysis (CADe: n = 506; SC: n = 503). AADR was comparable between the groups (21.3% vs. 20.5%, p = 0.794). However, CADe significantly improved ADR (67.6% vs. 59.8%, p = 0.012) and APC (1.82 ± 2.12 vs. 1.34 ± 1.81, p < 0.001). Mean WT was longer in the CADe group (17.10 ± 8.28 min vs. 16.13 ± 8.28 min, p = 0.016). Conclusions: In a FIT-based organized CRC screening setting, CADe did not enhance detection of AADR with a modest increase in withdrawal time. NCT04441580.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105028138419
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105028138419#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1002/ueg2.70176
DO - 10.1002/ueg2.70176
M3 - Article
C2 - 41563802
AN - SCOPUS:105028138419
SN - 2050-6406
VL - 14
JO - United European Gastroenterology Journal
JF - United European Gastroenterology Journal
IS - 1
M1 - e70176
ER -