Impact of earlier versus later monitoring on disease progression and healthcare costs among patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in the United States

Elias J. Jabbour, Lisa R. Siegartel, Jay Lin, Melissa Lingohr-Smith, Brandy Menges, Dinara Makenbaeva

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

We evaluated the impact of molecular monitoring earlier as compared to later in the course of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) on disease progression and healthcare costs in the real-world setting in the US. Patients with a diagnosis of CML were identified from the MarketScan claims databases (1 January 2006 to 30 June 2016). Multivariable regression analyses were used to control for differences in patient cohorts with earlier versus later monitoring. Of the 2730 CML patients in the study population, 60% (n = 1633) received earlier monitoring and 40% (n = 1097) received later monitoring only. After adjusting for differences in patient characteristics, patients with earlier monitoring had a lower likelihood of CML progression during the follow-up period (odds ratio: 0.72, confidence interval: 0.53–0.96; p =.03) and lower total healthcare costs ($6794 versus $9782 per-patient-per-month, p <.001) than patients with later monitoring. Patients who are monitored earlier in the course of CML may have better outcomes and lower total costs of care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)668-674
Number of pages7
JournalLeukemia and Lymphoma
Volume60
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 23 2019

Keywords

  • Chronic myeloid leukemia
  • disease progression
  • healthcare costs
  • monitoring

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hematology
  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Impact of earlier versus later monitoring on disease progression and healthcare costs among patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in the United States'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this