Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate differences in morbidity, progression-free interval, and survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer treated with initial chemotherapy versus initial surgery. Study design: All women with epithelial ovarian cancer who were treated surgically at our hospital between January 1, 1995, and January 1, 2003, were eligible; the cases of 200 patients met the criteria and underwent retrospective chart review. Results: Ninety-eight patients (49%) had initial chemotherapy, and 102 patients (51%) had initial surgery. Patients who received initial chemotherapy were more likely to have stage IV disease (initial chemotherapy, 27%, vs initial surgery, 8%; P = .042) and grade 3 disease (initial chemotherapy, 73%, vs initial surgery, 61%; P = .025). Optimal cytoreduction was achieved more often in patients who received initial chemotherapy (initial chemotherapy, 86%, vs initial surgery, 54%; P < .001). Only optimal cytoreduction (P = .022), and not treatment choice (P = .089), had an impact on median survival. Conclusion: Initial chemotherapy is a reasonable alternative to initial surgery for the treatment of selected patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 568-574 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | American journal of obstetrics and gynecology |
| Volume | 195 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Aug 2006 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Cytoreduction
- Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
- Ovarian cancer
ASJC Scopus subject areas
- Obstetrics and Gynecology
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Initial chemotherapy followed by surgical cytoreduction for the treatment of stage III/IV epithelial ovarian cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS