Long-term survival after post-hepatectomy liver failure for colorectal liver metastases

Katharina Joechle, Claire Goumard, Eduardo A. Vega, Masayuki Okuno, Yun Shin Chun, Ching Wei D. Tzeng, Jean Nicolas Vauthey, Claudius Conrad

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: While post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) accurately predicts short-term mortality, its role in prognosticating long-term overall survival (OS) remains unclear. Methods: Patients who underwent hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) after portal vein embolization during 1999–2015 were evaluated retrospectively. PHLF was defined per International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS) criteria and as Peak Bil >7 mg/dl. Survival was analyzed using log-rank statistic and Cox regression; patient mortality within 90 days was excluded. Results: Of 175 patients, 68 (39%) had PHLF according to ISGLS criteria, including 40 (23%) with ISGLS grade B/C, and 14 (8%) had Peak Bil >7 mg/dl. Patients with Peak Bil >7 mg/dl had significantly worse OS than patients without PHLF (median OS, 16 vs 58 months, p = 0.001). Patients with ISGLS defined PHLF (p = 0.251) and patients with ISGLS grade B/C PHLF (p = 0.220) did not have worse OS than patients without PHLF. Conclusion: Peak bilirubin >7 mg/dl impacts on long-term survival after hepatectomy for CRLM and is a better predictor of long-term survival than ISGLS-defined PHLF.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)361-369
Number of pages9
JournalHPB
Volume21
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2019

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hepatology
  • Gastroenterology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Long-term survival after post-hepatectomy liver failure for colorectal liver metastases'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this