Making informed choices on incorporating chemoprevention into carE (MiCHOICE, SWOG 1904): Design and methods of a cluster randomized controlled trial

K. D. Crew, G. L. Anderson, K. B. Arnold, A. P. Stieb, J. N. Amenta, N. Collins, C. W. Law, S. Pruthi, A. Sandoval-Leon, D. Bertoni, M. T. Grosse Perdekamp, S. Colonna, S. Krisher, T. King, L. D. Yee, T. J. Ballinger, C. Braun-Inglis, D. Mangino, K. B. Wisinski, C. A. DeYoungM. Ross, J. Floyd, A. Kaster, L. Vander Walde, T. Saphner, C. Zarwan, S. Lo, C. Graham, A. Conlin, K. Yost, D. Agnese, C. Jernigan, D. L. Hershman, M. L. Neuhouser, B. Arun, R. Kukafka

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Introduction: Women with atypical hyperplasia (AH) or lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) have a significantly increased risk of breast cancer, which can be substantially reduced with antiestrogen therapy for chemoprevention. However, antiestrogen therapy for breast cancer risk reduction remains underutilized. Improving knowledge about breast cancer risk and chemoprevention among high-risk patients and their healthcare providers may enhance informed decision-making about this critical breast cancer risk reduction strategy. Methods/design: We are conducting a cluster randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effectiveness and implementation of patient and provider decision support tools to improve informed choice about chemoprevention among women with AH or LCIS. We have cluster randomized 26 sites across the U.S. through the SWOG Cancer Research Network. A total of 415 patients and 200 healthcare providers are being recruited. They are assigned to standard educational materials alone or combined with the web-based decision support tools. Patient-reported and clinical outcomes are assessed at baseline, after a follow-up visit at 6 months, and yearly for 5 years. The primary outcome is chemoprevention informed choice after the follow-up visit. Secondary endpoints include other patient-reported outcomes, such as chemoprevention knowledge, decision conflict and regret, and self-reported chemoprevention usage. Barriers and facilitators to implementing decision support into clinic workflow are assessed through patient and provider interviews at baseline and mid-implementation. Results/discussion: With this hybrid effectiveness/implementation study, we seek to evaluate if a multi-level intervention effectively promotes informed decision-making about chemoprevention and provide valuable insights on how the intervention is implemented in U.S. clinical settings.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number107564
JournalContemporary Clinical Trials
Volume142
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2024

Keywords

  • Breast cancer chemoprevention
  • Cluster randomized trial
  • Decision support

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pharmacology (medical)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Making informed choices on incorporating chemoprevention into carE (MiCHOICE, SWOG 1904): Design and methods of a cluster randomized controlled trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this