TY - JOUR
T1 - Malignant peritoneal mesothelioma treated by cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy
T2 - Is GLUT1 expression a major prognostic factor? A preliminary study
AU - Hommell-Fontaine, J.
AU - Isaac, S.
AU - Passot, G.
AU - Decullier, E.
AU - Traverse-Glehen, A.
AU - Cotte, E.
AU - You, B.
AU - Mohamed, F.
AU - Gilly, F. N.
AU - Glehen, O.
AU - Berger, F.
N1 - Funding Information:
ACKNOWLEDGMENT The study was supported by RENAPE (Centre National de Référence des Tumeurs Rares du Péritoine) depending on INCa (Institut National du Cancer) for the purchase of some antibodies. The authors thank Béatrice Bancel and Céline Michaux for their contribution to laboratory technique, the ARCs Laurent Villeneuve, Isabelle Bonnefoy, Peggy Jourdan-Enfer and Emilie Mathiotte for their help with the clinical database, and Christelle Maurice for her contribution to statistical analysis.
PY - 2013/11
Y1 - 2013/11
N2 - Purpose: Diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM) is a rare primary peritoneal malignancy. Its prognosis has been improved by an aggressive locoregional treatment combining extensive cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Prognostic factors are currently poorly defined for this disease but are essential if treatment is to be standardized. Methods: Twenty-eight patients with DMPM, who were considered preoperatively to be candidates for CRS and HIPEC between June 1998 and August 2010 at our institution, were selected for this study. Medical records and histopathological features were retrospectively reviewed and 24 clinical, histological, and immunohistochemical parameters were assessed for their association with overall survival by univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: The following factors were significantly associated with overall survival by univariate analysis: predominant histological growth pattern in the epithelioid areas, nuclear grooves in the epithelioid areas, atypical mitoses, and calretinin and GLUT1 expression by immunohistochemistry in the epithelioid areas. Expression of the facilitative glucose transporter protein GLUT1 in the epithelioid areas was the only factor independently associated with overall survival by multivariate analysis. Conclusions: GLUT1 expression appears to be an indicator of poor prognosis in DMPM. Standard histological classification of DMPM may not be adequate to select patients for aggressive locoregional treatments, such as CRS and HIPEC. Multicenter validation of the prognostic factors identified in this preliminary study is needed to refine patient selection for potential cure.
AB - Purpose: Diffuse malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (DMPM) is a rare primary peritoneal malignancy. Its prognosis has been improved by an aggressive locoregional treatment combining extensive cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). Prognostic factors are currently poorly defined for this disease but are essential if treatment is to be standardized. Methods: Twenty-eight patients with DMPM, who were considered preoperatively to be candidates for CRS and HIPEC between June 1998 and August 2010 at our institution, were selected for this study. Medical records and histopathological features were retrospectively reviewed and 24 clinical, histological, and immunohistochemical parameters were assessed for their association with overall survival by univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: The following factors were significantly associated with overall survival by univariate analysis: predominant histological growth pattern in the epithelioid areas, nuclear grooves in the epithelioid areas, atypical mitoses, and calretinin and GLUT1 expression by immunohistochemistry in the epithelioid areas. Expression of the facilitative glucose transporter protein GLUT1 in the epithelioid areas was the only factor independently associated with overall survival by multivariate analysis. Conclusions: GLUT1 expression appears to be an indicator of poor prognosis in DMPM. Standard histological classification of DMPM may not be adequate to select patients for aggressive locoregional treatments, such as CRS and HIPEC. Multicenter validation of the prognostic factors identified in this preliminary study is needed to refine patient selection for potential cure.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84886099933
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84886099933#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1245/s10434-013-3077-4
DO - 10.1245/s10434-013-3077-4
M3 - Article
C2 - 23800898
AN - SCOPUS:84886099933
SN - 1068-9265
VL - 20
SP - 3892
EP - 3898
JO - Annals of surgical oncology
JF - Annals of surgical oncology
IS - 12
ER -