Malignant transformation of adenomyoepithelioma of the breast by a monophasic population: A report of two cases and review of literature

Cristina Marian, Adela Boila, Daniela Soanca, Minerva Malau, Daniela Maria Podeanu, Erika Resetkova, Simona Stolnicu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

Two cases of adenomyoepithelioma of the breast with malignant transformation by monophasic population of cells are presented. The underlying benign adenomyoepithelioma with typical biphasic architectural pattern was identified and represented at least 30% of the tumor in each case. In both cases, malignant portion of tumor was composed of relatively uniform monophasic population of highly atypical cells. The malignant component in case 1 was positive for pan cytokeratin, myoepithelial markers, and basal-type cytokeratins and also focally positive for luminal-type of cytokeratins, but negative for hormone receptors (estrogen and progesterone) and HER-2/neu protein overexpression. The malignant component in case 2 was positive for spectrum of myoepithelial markers but negative for luminal cytokeratins, hormone receptors and HER-2/neu protein overexpression. The bilinear immunophenotype in the case 1 suggests that the malignant tumor may have developed from precursor multipotent cells that can differentiate into both luminal epithelial and myoepithelial cells, although malignant component in case 2 appears to be the of pure myoepithelial phenotype.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)272-279
Number of pages8
JournalAPMIS
Volume121
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2013

Keywords

  • Adenomyoepithelioma of the breast
  • Bilinear immunophenotype
  • Myoepithelial carcinoma
  • Spindle malignant component

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine
  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Microbiology (medical)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Malignant transformation of adenomyoepithelioma of the breast by a monophasic population: A report of two cases and review of literature'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this