Menopausal hormone therapy does not influence lung cancer risk: Results from the California Teachers Study

Jessica Clague, Peggy Reynolds, Jane Sullivan-Halley, Huiyan Ma, James V. Lacey, Katherine D. Henderson, Giske Ursin, Dee West, Shine Chang, George L. Delclos, Xianglin L. Du, Michele R. Forman, Leslie Bernstein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

28 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Results from studies examining the association between hormone therapy (HT) and lung cancer risk disagree. Methods: We examined the associations between HT use and lung cancer risk among 60,592 postmenopausal women enrolled in the prospective California Teachers Study cohort. Between 1995 and 2007, a total of 727 women had a diagnosis of lung cancer. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models were fit using age as the time metric. Results: No measure of HT use was associated with lung cancer risk (all Ptrend values ≥0.4). In addition, no variations in risk by smoking status (never, ever, former, current), type of HT [estrogen (E)-alone, E + progestin (P) use], type of menopause, or lung cancer histology were observed. Conclusions: Our findings do not support an association between HT and lung cancer. Impact: This large-scale, prospective study, which capitalizes on the detailed hormone use, smoking history, and type of menopause information available within this unique cohort, was unable to find any association between intake of HT and lung cancer risk.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)560-564
Number of pages5
JournalCancer Epidemiology Biomarkers and Prevention
Volume20
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2011

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Oncology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Menopausal hormone therapy does not influence lung cancer risk: Results from the California Teachers Study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this