TY - JOUR
T1 - Monitoring linear accelerators electron beam energy constancy with a 2D ionization chamber array and double-wedge phantom
AU - Gao, Song
AU - Chetvertkov, Mikhail A.
AU - Simon, William E.
AU - Sadeghi, Amir
AU - Balter, Peter A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.
PY - 2020/1/1
Y1 - 2020/1/1
N2 - Validate that a two-dimensional (2D) ionization chamber array (ICA) combined with a double-wedge plate (DWP) can track changes in electron beam energy well within 2.0 mms as recommended by TG-142 for monthly quality assurance (QA). Electron beam profiles of 4–22 MeV were measured for a 25 × 25 cm2 cone using an ICA with a DWP placed on top of it along one diagonal axis. The relationship between the full width half maximum (FWHM) field size created by DWP energy degradation across the field and the depth of 50% dose in water (R50) is calibrated for a given ICA/DWP combination in beams of know energies (R50 values). Once this relationship is established, the ICA/DWP system will report the R50FWHM directly. We calibrated the ICA/DWP on a linear accelerator with energies of 6, 9, 12, 16, 20, and 22 MeV. The R50FWHM values of these beams and eight other beams with different R50 values were measured and compared with the R50 measured in water, that is, R50Water. Resolving changes of R50 up to 0.2 cm with ICA/DWP was tested by adding solid-water to shift the energy and was verified with R50Water measurements. To check the long-term reproducibility of ICA/DWP we measured R50FWHM on a monthly basis for a period of 3 yr. We proposed a universal calibration procedure considering the off-axis corrections and compared calibrations and measurements on three types of linacs (Varian TrueBeam, Varian C-series, and Elekta) with different nominal energies and R50 values. For all 38 beams on same type of linac with R50values over a range of 2–8.8 cm, the R50FWHM reported by the ICA/DWP system agreed with that measured in water within 0.01 ± 0.03 cm (mean ± 1σ) and maximum discrepancy of 0.07 cm. Long-term reproducibility results show the ICA/DWP system to be within 0.04 cm of their baseline over 3 yr. With the universal calibration the maximum discrepancy between R50FWHM and R50Water for different types of linac reduced from 0.25 to 0.06 cm. Comparison of R50FWHM values and R50Water values and long-term reproducibility of R50FWHM values indicates that the ICA/DWP can be used for monitoring of electron beam energy constancy well within TG-142 recommended tolerance.
AB - Validate that a two-dimensional (2D) ionization chamber array (ICA) combined with a double-wedge plate (DWP) can track changes in electron beam energy well within 2.0 mms as recommended by TG-142 for monthly quality assurance (QA). Electron beam profiles of 4–22 MeV were measured for a 25 × 25 cm2 cone using an ICA with a DWP placed on top of it along one diagonal axis. The relationship between the full width half maximum (FWHM) field size created by DWP energy degradation across the field and the depth of 50% dose in water (R50) is calibrated for a given ICA/DWP combination in beams of know energies (R50 values). Once this relationship is established, the ICA/DWP system will report the R50FWHM directly. We calibrated the ICA/DWP on a linear accelerator with energies of 6, 9, 12, 16, 20, and 22 MeV. The R50FWHM values of these beams and eight other beams with different R50 values were measured and compared with the R50 measured in water, that is, R50Water. Resolving changes of R50 up to 0.2 cm with ICA/DWP was tested by adding solid-water to shift the energy and was verified with R50Water measurements. To check the long-term reproducibility of ICA/DWP we measured R50FWHM on a monthly basis for a period of 3 yr. We proposed a universal calibration procedure considering the off-axis corrections and compared calibrations and measurements on three types of linacs (Varian TrueBeam, Varian C-series, and Elekta) with different nominal energies and R50 values. For all 38 beams on same type of linac with R50values over a range of 2–8.8 cm, the R50FWHM reported by the ICA/DWP system agreed with that measured in water within 0.01 ± 0.03 cm (mean ± 1σ) and maximum discrepancy of 0.07 cm. Long-term reproducibility results show the ICA/DWP system to be within 0.04 cm of their baseline over 3 yr. With the universal calibration the maximum discrepancy between R50FWHM and R50Water for different types of linac reduced from 0.25 to 0.06 cm. Comparison of R50FWHM values and R50Water values and long-term reproducibility of R50FWHM values indicates that the ICA/DWP can be used for monitoring of electron beam energy constancy well within TG-142 recommended tolerance.
KW - beam energy constancy
KW - ionization chamber array
KW - quality assurance
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074459461&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85074459461&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/acm2.12751
DO - 10.1002/acm2.12751
M3 - Article
C2 - 31633877
AN - SCOPUS:85074459461
SN - 1526-9914
VL - 21
SP - 18
EP - 25
JO - Journal of applied clinical medical physics
JF - Journal of applied clinical medical physics
IS - 1
ER -