MRI for Evaluation of Complications of Breast Augmentation

Brian D. Noreña-Rengifo, Maria Paulina Sanín-Ramírez, Beatriz E. Adrada, Ana Beatriz Luengas, Vicente Martínez de Vega, Mary S. Guirguis, Cristina Saldarriaga-Uribe

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Scopus citations

Abstract

Breast augmentation is one of the most common aesthetic procedures performed in the United States. Several techniques of breast augmentation have been developed, including the implantation of breast prostheses and the injection of autologous fat and other ma-terials. The most common method of breast augmentation is to implant a prosthesis. There are different types of breast implants that vary in shape, composition, and the number of lumina. The rupture of breast implants is the leading cause of implant removal. The rupture rate increases substantially with the increasing age of the im-plant. Most implant ruptures are asymptomatic. Implant complications can be grouped into two categories: local complications in the breast and adjacent soft tissue, and systemic complications associated with rheumatologic or neurologic symptoms. The onset of local complications may be early (infection and periprosthetic collections including seromas, hematomas, or abscesses) or late (capsular con-traction, implant rupture, gel bleed, or breast implant–associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma). Although mammography is the imaging modality for breast cancer screening, noncontrast breast MRI is the imaging modality of choice for evaluation of the integrity of breast implants and the complications of breast augmentation, for equivocal findings at conventional imaging, and as a supple-ment to mammography in patients with free injectable materials. The fifth edition of the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) provides a systematic outline for MRI evaluation of patients with breast implants. Silicone-and water-selective sequences provide useful supplemental information to confirm intracapsular and extracapsular rupture. Breast MRI for evaluation of implant integrity does not require intravenous contrast material. The use of MRI contrast material in patients with breast augmentation is indicated when infection or malignancy is suspected. Radiologists should have a thorough understanding of the different techniques for breast augmentation, normal imaging features, and complications specific to breast augmentation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)929-946
Number of pages18
JournalRadiographics
Volume42
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2022

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'MRI for Evaluation of Complications of Breast Augmentation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this