Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma – does pathologic response mean better outcomes?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in the management of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) remains unknown. We sought to evaluate our experience treating high-risk ICC with NAC and to determine the prognostic significance of pathologic response. Methods: Patients with ICC treated with NAC and surgery were analyzed using a prospectively maintained database. Pathologic response was graded by a blinded pathologist. Clinicopathologic/treatment variables were evaluated for associations with survival. Results: Among 45 patients who received NAC followed by hepatectomy for high-risk ICC, 32(71%) were considered stage III, and 6(13%) were considered stage IV at time of diagnosis. Major response was identified in 39% of cases, including 2 with pathologic complete response. Patients with major response had a longer median NAC duration than patients with minor response (6 vs 4cycles, P=0.02). Regimen (gemcitabine/cisplatin vs gemcitabine/cisplatin/nab-paclitaxel) was not associated with response rate. Median recurrence-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were 11 and 45 months. Pathologic response was not associated with improved survival. Conclusion: Pathologic response to NAC was not associated with survival in this highly selected cohort. Nonetheless, the extended OS experienced by these high-risk patients is encouraging and suggests that NAC may help select patients who stand to benefit from aggressive resection.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)472-480
Number of pages9
JournalHPB
Volume25
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2023

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hepatology
  • Gastroenterology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high-risk intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma – does pathologic response mean better outcomes?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this