Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Novel Postneoadjuvant Prognostic Breast Cancer Staging System

  • David J. Winchester
  • , Lavisha Singh
  • , Stephen B. Edge
  • , Kimberly H. Allison
  • , William E. Barlow
  • , Veerle Bossuyt
  • , Mariana Chavez-Macgregor
  • , Emily F. Conant
  • , James L. Connolly
  • , Jennifer F. De Los Santos
  • , Daniel F. Hayes
  • , Nola M. Hylton
  • , Elizabeth A. Mittendorf
  • , Jennifer K. Plichta
  • , Elena Provenzano
  • , Kilian E. Salerno
  • , Priyanka Sharma
  • , W. Fraser Symmans
  • , Donald Weaver
  • , Gabriel N. Hortobagyi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

PURPOSEPrognostic staging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) is not included in American Joint Commission on Cancer (AJCC) staging. This study addressed this deficiency by including responses to therapy with standardized staging variables in a validated prognostic staging system for patients treated with NACT.METHODSThe National Cancer Database was queried to identify 140,605 patients treated with NACT between 2010 and 2018. Three response categories (no response, partial response, and complete response [pCR]) were created on the basis of comparison of clinical and post-NACT pathologic staging. Univariate and multivariate analyses of clinical stage, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), and grade were analyzed for each category. Predictive models for each response category were validated using the bootstrap technique. Calibration plots compared predicted and observed 3-year survival probabilities in the training and validation data sets.RESULTSEach validated model demonstrated statistically significant survival differences in the postneoadjuvant prognostic stage assignment. Of all patients with a pCR, 94.2% were assigned to postneoadjuvant ypStage I compared with 35.5% of patients with no response. Advancing clinical stage had a progressive but small impact on overall survival (OS) with pCR (high-grade, triple-negative breast cancer [TNBC]: cStage I, 97% v cStage IIIB/IIIC, 91%; grade 2 luminal A: 97% v 91%) but was associated with a profound decrease in OS with no response for TNBC or HER2+ disease (high-grade TNBC 89% v 50%) and less profound for grade 2 luminal A disease with no response (97% v 81%).CONCLUSIONWe present a novel, validated prognostic staging system that predicts OS according to the response to NACT. These data will provide AJCC stage assignments for a growing proportion of patients treated with NACT.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1948-1960
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Clinical Oncology
Volume43
Issue number17
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 10 2025

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Novel Postneoadjuvant Prognostic Breast Cancer Staging System'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this