Novel strategies for evaluating and improving plastic surgery applicant selection

Francis D. Graziano, Maria Mavrommatis, Paul L. Shay, Michael J. Ingargiola, Paymon Sanati-Mehrizy, Peter W. Henderson, Frank Fang, Peter J. Taub

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Summary: Residency applicant evaluation and selection is a critical part of developing and maintaining a high-quality plastic surgery residency program. Currently, many programs rely on objective measures such as the United States Medical Licensing Exam scores, number of research publications, grade point average, Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Medical Society status, or a combination of these objective metrics. However, there is a growing body of literature suggesting that the current means of residency applicant evaluation and selection may not be the best predictive factors of future resident success. The aim of this study was to identify nontraditional means of evaluating plastic surgery residency candidates and discuss how these means have been implemented at the authors' institution. After reviewing industry hiring practices, the authors propose that standardized interviewing and personality testing can help evaluate some of the previously intangible parts of an applicant that may play a role in teamwork, commitment, and dedication to patient care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1040E-1046E
JournalPlastic and reconstructive surgery
Volume148
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2021
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Novel strategies for evaluating and improving plastic surgery applicant selection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this