TY - JOUR
T1 - Oncological Outcomes Following Robotic Postchemotherapy Retroperitoneal Lymph Node Dissection for Testicular Cancer
T2 - A Worldwide Multicenter Study
AU - Ghoreifi, Alireza
AU - Sheybaee Moghaddam, Farshad
AU - Mitra, Anirban P.
AU - Khanna, Ashish
AU - Singh, Amitabh
AU - Chavarriaga, Julian
AU - Moon, Sol C.
AU - Goolam, Ahmed Saeed
AU - Chuang, Ryan
AU - Rich, Jordan M.
AU - Baky, Fady J.
AU - Ho, Matthew
AU - Roberts, Jacob
AU - Gill, Inderbir S.
AU - Porter, James R.
AU - Ahmadi, Nariman
AU - Mehrazin, Reza
AU - Sfakianos, John P.
AU - Rais-Bahrami, Soroush
AU - Bagrodia, Aditya
AU - Hamilton, Robert J.
AU - Eggener, Scott
AU - Rawal, Sudhir
AU - Ward, John F.
AU - Djaladat, Hooman
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 European Association of Urology
PY - 2025/3
Y1 - 2025/3
N2 - Background and objective: The feasibility and safety of a robotic approach for postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (PC-RPLND) in testicular cancer have been demonstrated, but data on long-term oncological outcomes of this procedure are limited. Our aim was to evaluate oncological outcomes following robotic PC-RPLND in this setting. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients with testicular cancer treated with robotic PC-RPLND at 11 academic centers worldwide between 2011 and 2023. Patient characteristics, clinicopathological findings, and oncological outcomes were recorded. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was estimated via the Kaplan-Meier method. Key findings and limitations: A total of 173 patients were included, of whom 159 underwent pure robotic PC-RPLND; 14 cases were converted to open surgery. Among the pure robotic cases, 152 (96%) had nonseminoma, 122 (77%) had International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group good risk, and 120 (76%) had a postchemotherapy mass size ≤5 cm. Salvage chemotherapy was received by ten patients (6%). Median estimated blood loss, operative time, and length of hospital stay were 100 ml, 300 min, and 2 d, respectively. Final pathology revealed necrosis/fibrosis in 64 cases (40%), teratoma in 78 (49%), and viable germ-cell tumor in 17 (11%). At median follow-up of 22 mo (interquartile range 7–50), eight patients had disease recurrence, which was in-field in three cases. One port-site recurrence was identified. The median time to recurrence was 7 mo. The 4-yr RFS rate was 93%. Two cancer-related deaths were recorded. Subgroup analysis revealed that patients with conversion to open surgery were more likely to have a larger preoperative mass and received salvage chemotherapy before RPLND. In addition, conversion to open surgery was associated with a higher rate of perioperative complications; however, oncological outcomes were statistically similar to those for pure robotic PC-RPLND. The main limitation of the study is its retrospective nature. Conclusions and clinical implications: Robotic PC-RPLND in testicular cancer is associated with acceptable intermediate-term oncological outcomes in appropriately selected patients. Patient summary: In this large multicenter study, we investigated the outcomes of robotic surgery after chemotherapy for advanced testicular cancer. We found that robotic surgery yields acceptable cancer control results.
AB - Background and objective: The feasibility and safety of a robotic approach for postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (PC-RPLND) in testicular cancer have been demonstrated, but data on long-term oncological outcomes of this procedure are limited. Our aim was to evaluate oncological outcomes following robotic PC-RPLND in this setting. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients with testicular cancer treated with robotic PC-RPLND at 11 academic centers worldwide between 2011 and 2023. Patient characteristics, clinicopathological findings, and oncological outcomes were recorded. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was estimated via the Kaplan-Meier method. Key findings and limitations: A total of 173 patients were included, of whom 159 underwent pure robotic PC-RPLND; 14 cases were converted to open surgery. Among the pure robotic cases, 152 (96%) had nonseminoma, 122 (77%) had International Germ Cell Cancer Collaborative Group good risk, and 120 (76%) had a postchemotherapy mass size ≤5 cm. Salvage chemotherapy was received by ten patients (6%). Median estimated blood loss, operative time, and length of hospital stay were 100 ml, 300 min, and 2 d, respectively. Final pathology revealed necrosis/fibrosis in 64 cases (40%), teratoma in 78 (49%), and viable germ-cell tumor in 17 (11%). At median follow-up of 22 mo (interquartile range 7–50), eight patients had disease recurrence, which was in-field in three cases. One port-site recurrence was identified. The median time to recurrence was 7 mo. The 4-yr RFS rate was 93%. Two cancer-related deaths were recorded. Subgroup analysis revealed that patients with conversion to open surgery were more likely to have a larger preoperative mass and received salvage chemotherapy before RPLND. In addition, conversion to open surgery was associated with a higher rate of perioperative complications; however, oncological outcomes were statistically similar to those for pure robotic PC-RPLND. The main limitation of the study is its retrospective nature. Conclusions and clinical implications: Robotic PC-RPLND in testicular cancer is associated with acceptable intermediate-term oncological outcomes in appropriately selected patients. Patient summary: In this large multicenter study, we investigated the outcomes of robotic surgery after chemotherapy for advanced testicular cancer. We found that robotic surgery yields acceptable cancer control results.
KW - Nonseminomatous germ cell tumor
KW - Outcomes
KW - Retroperitoneal lymph node dissection
KW - Robotic surgery
KW - Testicular neoplasms
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85209141108
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85209141108#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1016/j.euf.2024.11.001
DO - 10.1016/j.euf.2024.11.001
M3 - Article
C2 - 39551650
AN - SCOPUS:85209141108
SN - 2405-4569
VL - 11
SP - 266
EP - 272
JO - European Urology Focus
JF - European Urology Focus
IS - 2
ER -