TY - JOUR
T1 - Optimizing Outcomes in Pharyngoesophageal Reconstruction and Neck Resurfacing
T2 - 10-Year Experience of 294 Cases
AU - Sharaf, Basel
AU - Xue, Amy
AU - Solari, Mario G.
AU - Boa, Olivier
AU - Liu, Jun
AU - Hanasono, Matthew M.
AU - Skoracki, Roman
AU - Yu, Peirong
AU - Selber, Jesse C.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2016 American Society of Plastic Surgeons.
PY - 2017/1/1
Y1 - 2017/1/1
N2 - Background: Pharyngoesophageal reconstruction is a complex endeavor that poses many challenges. This 10-year series examines factors impacting the need for neck skin resurfacing and evaluates the impact of reconstructive modalities on outcomes. Methods: A review identified 294 patients who underwent pharyngoesophageal reconstruction from 2002 to 2012. Patients were divided based on neck skin resurfacing requirements. Patients undergoing neck resurfacing were further subdivided into reconstructive technique, including a second skin paddle or muscle component from the same free flap pedicle, a local flap, or a second free flap. All groups were compared by comorbidities, complications, and functional outcomes. Results: Of 294 patients, 179 (60.9 percent) required neck skin resurfacing. In the resurfaced group, there were 90 circumferential defects (50.3 percent) and 89 partial defects (49.7 percent). In the resurfaced group, 110 (61.4 percent) underwent reconstruction with a second skin paddle from the same free flap pedicle, 21 (11.7 percent) underwent reconstruction with a muscle component from the same pedicle, and 25 (13.9 percent) received a pectoralis major flap. There were five external paddle flap losses in the resurfaced group (2.8 percent) and no internal flap losses. Overall complications were similar among groups. The resurfaced group had a lower pharyngocutaneous fistula rate (4.5 percent) compared with the primary closure group (11.3 percent) (p = 0.026). Prior neck surgery and radiation therapy were strong predictors of neck skin resurfacing (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Neck resurfacing is often required in salvage pharyngoesophageal reconstruction. Providing additional vascularized tissue over the neoconduit is predictive of lower pharyngocutaneous fistula rates. An algorithmic approach to neck resurfacing is presented.
AB - Background: Pharyngoesophageal reconstruction is a complex endeavor that poses many challenges. This 10-year series examines factors impacting the need for neck skin resurfacing and evaluates the impact of reconstructive modalities on outcomes. Methods: A review identified 294 patients who underwent pharyngoesophageal reconstruction from 2002 to 2012. Patients were divided based on neck skin resurfacing requirements. Patients undergoing neck resurfacing were further subdivided into reconstructive technique, including a second skin paddle or muscle component from the same free flap pedicle, a local flap, or a second free flap. All groups were compared by comorbidities, complications, and functional outcomes. Results: Of 294 patients, 179 (60.9 percent) required neck skin resurfacing. In the resurfaced group, there were 90 circumferential defects (50.3 percent) and 89 partial defects (49.7 percent). In the resurfaced group, 110 (61.4 percent) underwent reconstruction with a second skin paddle from the same free flap pedicle, 21 (11.7 percent) underwent reconstruction with a muscle component from the same pedicle, and 25 (13.9 percent) received a pectoralis major flap. There were five external paddle flap losses in the resurfaced group (2.8 percent) and no internal flap losses. Overall complications were similar among groups. The resurfaced group had a lower pharyngocutaneous fistula rate (4.5 percent) compared with the primary closure group (11.3 percent) (p = 0.026). Prior neck surgery and radiation therapy were strong predictors of neck skin resurfacing (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Neck resurfacing is often required in salvage pharyngoesophageal reconstruction. Providing additional vascularized tissue over the neoconduit is predictive of lower pharyngocutaneous fistula rates. An algorithmic approach to neck resurfacing is presented.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85007279082&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85007279082&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002915
DO - 10.1097/PRS.0000000000002915
M3 - Article
C2 - 28027247
AN - SCOPUS:85007279082
SN - 0032-1052
VL - 139
SP - 105e-119e
JO - Plastic and reconstructive surgery
JF - Plastic and reconstructive surgery
IS - 1
ER -