TY - JOUR
T1 - PREDICT validity for prognosis of breast cancer patients with pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants
AU - HEBON Investigators
AU - Muranen, Taru A.
AU - Morra, Anna
AU - Khan, Sofia
AU - Barnes, Daniel R.
AU - Bolla, Manjeet K.
AU - Dennis, Joe
AU - Keeman, Renske
AU - Leslie, Goska
AU - Parsons, Michael T.
AU - Wang, Qin
AU - Ahearn, Thomas U.
AU - Aittomäki, Kristiina
AU - Andrulis, Irene L.
AU - Arun, Banu K.
AU - Behrens, Sabine
AU - Bialkowska, Katarzyna
AU - Bojesen, Stig E.
AU - Camp, Nicola J.
AU - Chang-Claude, Jenny
AU - Czene, Kamila
AU - Devilee, Peter
AU - Domchek, Susan M.
AU - Dunning, Alison M.
AU - Engel, Christoph
AU - Evans, D. Gareth
AU - Gago-Dominguez, Manuela
AU - García-Closas, Montserrat
AU - Gerdes, Anne Marie
AU - Glendon, Gord
AU - Guénel, Pascal
AU - Hahnen, Eric
AU - Hamann, Ute
AU - Hanson, Helen
AU - Hooning, Maartje J.
AU - Hoppe, Reiner
AU - Izatt, Louise
AU - Jakubowska, Anna
AU - James, Paul A.
AU - Kristensen, Vessela N.
AU - Lalloo, Fiona
AU - Lindeman, Geoffrey J.
AU - Mannermaa, Arto
AU - Margolin, Sara
AU - Neuhausen, Susan L.
AU - Newman, William G.
AU - Peterlongo, Paolo
AU - Phillips, Kelly Anne
AU - Pujana, Miquel Angel
AU - Rantala, Johanna
AU - Rønlund, Karina
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, The Author(s).
PY - 2023/12
Y1 - 2023/12
N2 - We assessed the PREDICT v 2.2 for prognosis of breast cancer patients with pathogenic germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants, using follow-up data from 5453 BRCA1/2 carriers from the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2 (CIMBA) and the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC). PREDICT for estrogen receptor (ER)-negative breast cancer had modest discrimination for BRCA1 carrier patients overall (Gönen & Heller unbiased concordance 0.65 in CIMBA, 0.64 in BCAC), but it distinguished clearly the high-mortality group from lower risk categories. In an analysis of low to high risk categories by PREDICT score percentiles, the observed mortality was consistently lower than the expected mortality, but the confidence intervals always included the calibration slope. Altogether, our results encourage the use of the PREDICT ER-negative model in management of breast cancer patients with germline BRCA1 variants. For the PREDICT ER-positive model, the discrimination was slightly lower in BRCA2 variant carriers (concordance 0.60 in CIMBA, 0.65 in BCAC). Especially, inclusion of the tumor grade distorted the prognostic estimates. The breast cancer mortality of BRCA2 carriers was underestimated at the low end of the PREDICT score distribution, whereas at the high end, the mortality was overestimated. These data suggest that BRCA2 status should also be taken into consideration with tumor characteristics, when estimating the prognosis of ER-positive breast cancer patients.
AB - We assessed the PREDICT v 2.2 for prognosis of breast cancer patients with pathogenic germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants, using follow-up data from 5453 BRCA1/2 carriers from the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2 (CIMBA) and the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC). PREDICT for estrogen receptor (ER)-negative breast cancer had modest discrimination for BRCA1 carrier patients overall (Gönen & Heller unbiased concordance 0.65 in CIMBA, 0.64 in BCAC), but it distinguished clearly the high-mortality group from lower risk categories. In an analysis of low to high risk categories by PREDICT score percentiles, the observed mortality was consistently lower than the expected mortality, but the confidence intervals always included the calibration slope. Altogether, our results encourage the use of the PREDICT ER-negative model in management of breast cancer patients with germline BRCA1 variants. For the PREDICT ER-positive model, the discrimination was slightly lower in BRCA2 variant carriers (concordance 0.60 in CIMBA, 0.65 in BCAC). Especially, inclusion of the tumor grade distorted the prognostic estimates. The breast cancer mortality of BRCA2 carriers was underestimated at the low end of the PREDICT score distribution, whereas at the high end, the mortality was overestimated. These data suggest that BRCA2 status should also be taken into consideration with tumor characteristics, when estimating the prognosis of ER-positive breast cancer patients.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85160095823&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85160095823&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1038/s41523-023-00546-x
DO - 10.1038/s41523-023-00546-x
M3 - Article
C2 - 37173335
AN - SCOPUS:85160095823
SN - 2374-4677
VL - 9
JO - npj Breast Cancer
JF - npj Breast Cancer
IS - 1
M1 - 37
ER -