Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Pro/Con: Randomization in phase II clinical trials

  • Greg Yothers
  • , H. Samuel Wieand
  • , Emil J. Freireich

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

In summary, this is a moment in history when we have a large number new agents to investigate in the clinic. The consequence is that we have to use the techniques that are most efficient in terms of identifying effective new therapies and, most importantly, provide each patient with the best opportunity to receive efective therapy. These goals are best served by adequate, efficient phase I studies, well-designed phase II studies, and phase III studies that identify treatments that provide the greatest benefits for our patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)776-778
Number of pages3
JournalClinical Advances in Hematology and Oncology
Volume4
Issue number10
StatePublished - Oct 2006

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hematology
  • Oncology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pro/Con: Randomization in phase II clinical trials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this