Promoting Primary Care Smoking-Cessation Support with Quitlines. The QuitLink Randomized Controlled Trial

Stephen F. Rothemich, Steven H. Woolf, Robert E. Johnson, Kelly J. Devers, Sharon K. Flores, Pamela Villars, Vance A Rabius, Tim McAfee

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Counseling by clinicians promotes smoking cessation, but in most U.S. primary care practices, it is difficult to provide more than brief advice to quit in the course of routine work. Telephone quitlines can deliver effective intensive counseling, but few collaborate closely with clinicians. Purpose: This study aimed to determine whether cessation support in practices is enhanced by a systems approach, in partnership with quitlines. Design: A cluster RCT was used. Setting/participants: Participants included 1817 adult smokers from 16 primary care practices in the Virginia Ambulatory Care Outcomes Research Network. Intervention: An expanded tobacco-use "vital sign" intervention (identify smokers, advise cessation, and assess readiness to quit) that was combined with fax referral of preparation-stage smokers to a quitline providing feedback to practices was compared to a traditional tobacco-use vital sign alone. Main outcome measures: The frequency of cessation support (in-office discussion of methods to quit or quitline referral) reported by patients in an exit survey (September 2005-July 2006, analyzed in 2008) was measured. Results: The adjusted percentage of smokers who reported receiving cessation support differed by 12.5% in intervention and control practices (40.7% vs 28.2%, respectively; p<0.001). Both in-office discussion of methods to quit and quitline referral increased significantly with the intervention. Post hoc analysis revealed that the increase in cessation was stable for both patient gender and visit type and was more pronounced with patients aged 35-54 years and with male and more experienced clinicians. Conclusions: A systems approach to identifying smokers, advising and assessing readiness to quit, combined with a partnership with a quitline, increases delivery of cessation support for primary care patients beyond that accomplished by traditional tobacco-use vital sign screening alone. Clinical trial registration: NCT00112268.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)367-374
Number of pages8
JournalAmerican Journal of Preventive Medicine
Volume38
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2010

Fingerprint

Smoking Cessation
Vital Signs
Primary Health Care
Tobacco Use
Randomized Controlled Trials
Referral and Consultation
Systems Analysis
Counseling
Telefacsimile
Outcome Assessment (Health Care)
Ambulatory Care
Telephone
Clinical Trials

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Epidemiology
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cite this

Rothemich, S. F., Woolf, S. H., Johnson, R. E., Devers, K. J., Flores, S. K., Villars, P., ... McAfee, T. (2010). Promoting Primary Care Smoking-Cessation Support with Quitlines. The QuitLink Randomized Controlled Trial. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 38(4), 367-374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2010.01.008

Promoting Primary Care Smoking-Cessation Support with Quitlines. The QuitLink Randomized Controlled Trial. / Rothemich, Stephen F.; Woolf, Steven H.; Johnson, Robert E.; Devers, Kelly J.; Flores, Sharon K.; Villars, Pamela; Rabius, Vance A; McAfee, Tim.

In: American Journal of Preventive Medicine, Vol. 38, No. 4, 01.04.2010, p. 367-374.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Rothemich, SF, Woolf, SH, Johnson, RE, Devers, KJ, Flores, SK, Villars, P, Rabius, VA & McAfee, T 2010, 'Promoting Primary Care Smoking-Cessation Support with Quitlines. The QuitLink Randomized Controlled Trial', American Journal of Preventive Medicine, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 367-374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2010.01.008
Rothemich, Stephen F. ; Woolf, Steven H. ; Johnson, Robert E. ; Devers, Kelly J. ; Flores, Sharon K. ; Villars, Pamela ; Rabius, Vance A ; McAfee, Tim. / Promoting Primary Care Smoking-Cessation Support with Quitlines. The QuitLink Randomized Controlled Trial. In: American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2010 ; Vol. 38, No. 4. pp. 367-374.
@article{a2dce2bf9d2643cdb9945627cad87e8a,
title = "Promoting Primary Care Smoking-Cessation Support with Quitlines. The QuitLink Randomized Controlled Trial",
abstract = "Background: Counseling by clinicians promotes smoking cessation, but in most U.S. primary care practices, it is difficult to provide more than brief advice to quit in the course of routine work. Telephone quitlines can deliver effective intensive counseling, but few collaborate closely with clinicians. Purpose: This study aimed to determine whether cessation support in practices is enhanced by a systems approach, in partnership with quitlines. Design: A cluster RCT was used. Setting/participants: Participants included 1817 adult smokers from 16 primary care practices in the Virginia Ambulatory Care Outcomes Research Network. Intervention: An expanded tobacco-use {"}vital sign{"} intervention (identify smokers, advise cessation, and assess readiness to quit) that was combined with fax referral of preparation-stage smokers to a quitline providing feedback to practices was compared to a traditional tobacco-use vital sign alone. Main outcome measures: The frequency of cessation support (in-office discussion of methods to quit or quitline referral) reported by patients in an exit survey (September 2005-July 2006, analyzed in 2008) was measured. Results: The adjusted percentage of smokers who reported receiving cessation support differed by 12.5{\%} in intervention and control practices (40.7{\%} vs 28.2{\%}, respectively; p<0.001). Both in-office discussion of methods to quit and quitline referral increased significantly with the intervention. Post hoc analysis revealed that the increase in cessation was stable for both patient gender and visit type and was more pronounced with patients aged 35-54 years and with male and more experienced clinicians. Conclusions: A systems approach to identifying smokers, advising and assessing readiness to quit, combined with a partnership with a quitline, increases delivery of cessation support for primary care patients beyond that accomplished by traditional tobacco-use vital sign screening alone. Clinical trial registration: NCT00112268.",
author = "Rothemich, {Stephen F.} and Woolf, {Steven H.} and Johnson, {Robert E.} and Devers, {Kelly J.} and Flores, {Sharon K.} and Pamela Villars and Rabius, {Vance A} and Tim McAfee",
year = "2010",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.amepre.2010.01.008",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "38",
pages = "367--374",
journal = "American Journal of Preventive Medicine",
issn = "0749-3797",
publisher = "Elsevier Inc.",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Promoting Primary Care Smoking-Cessation Support with Quitlines. The QuitLink Randomized Controlled Trial

AU - Rothemich, Stephen F.

AU - Woolf, Steven H.

AU - Johnson, Robert E.

AU - Devers, Kelly J.

AU - Flores, Sharon K.

AU - Villars, Pamela

AU - Rabius, Vance A

AU - McAfee, Tim

PY - 2010/4/1

Y1 - 2010/4/1

N2 - Background: Counseling by clinicians promotes smoking cessation, but in most U.S. primary care practices, it is difficult to provide more than brief advice to quit in the course of routine work. Telephone quitlines can deliver effective intensive counseling, but few collaborate closely with clinicians. Purpose: This study aimed to determine whether cessation support in practices is enhanced by a systems approach, in partnership with quitlines. Design: A cluster RCT was used. Setting/participants: Participants included 1817 adult smokers from 16 primary care practices in the Virginia Ambulatory Care Outcomes Research Network. Intervention: An expanded tobacco-use "vital sign" intervention (identify smokers, advise cessation, and assess readiness to quit) that was combined with fax referral of preparation-stage smokers to a quitline providing feedback to practices was compared to a traditional tobacco-use vital sign alone. Main outcome measures: The frequency of cessation support (in-office discussion of methods to quit or quitline referral) reported by patients in an exit survey (September 2005-July 2006, analyzed in 2008) was measured. Results: The adjusted percentage of smokers who reported receiving cessation support differed by 12.5% in intervention and control practices (40.7% vs 28.2%, respectively; p<0.001). Both in-office discussion of methods to quit and quitline referral increased significantly with the intervention. Post hoc analysis revealed that the increase in cessation was stable for both patient gender and visit type and was more pronounced with patients aged 35-54 years and with male and more experienced clinicians. Conclusions: A systems approach to identifying smokers, advising and assessing readiness to quit, combined with a partnership with a quitline, increases delivery of cessation support for primary care patients beyond that accomplished by traditional tobacco-use vital sign screening alone. Clinical trial registration: NCT00112268.

AB - Background: Counseling by clinicians promotes smoking cessation, but in most U.S. primary care practices, it is difficult to provide more than brief advice to quit in the course of routine work. Telephone quitlines can deliver effective intensive counseling, but few collaborate closely with clinicians. Purpose: This study aimed to determine whether cessation support in practices is enhanced by a systems approach, in partnership with quitlines. Design: A cluster RCT was used. Setting/participants: Participants included 1817 adult smokers from 16 primary care practices in the Virginia Ambulatory Care Outcomes Research Network. Intervention: An expanded tobacco-use "vital sign" intervention (identify smokers, advise cessation, and assess readiness to quit) that was combined with fax referral of preparation-stage smokers to a quitline providing feedback to practices was compared to a traditional tobacco-use vital sign alone. Main outcome measures: The frequency of cessation support (in-office discussion of methods to quit or quitline referral) reported by patients in an exit survey (September 2005-July 2006, analyzed in 2008) was measured. Results: The adjusted percentage of smokers who reported receiving cessation support differed by 12.5% in intervention and control practices (40.7% vs 28.2%, respectively; p<0.001). Both in-office discussion of methods to quit and quitline referral increased significantly with the intervention. Post hoc analysis revealed that the increase in cessation was stable for both patient gender and visit type and was more pronounced with patients aged 35-54 years and with male and more experienced clinicians. Conclusions: A systems approach to identifying smokers, advising and assessing readiness to quit, combined with a partnership with a quitline, increases delivery of cessation support for primary care patients beyond that accomplished by traditional tobacco-use vital sign screening alone. Clinical trial registration: NCT00112268.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77949461183&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77949461183&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.01.008

DO - 10.1016/j.amepre.2010.01.008

M3 - Article

C2 - 20307804

AN - SCOPUS:77949461183

VL - 38

SP - 367

EP - 374

JO - American Journal of Preventive Medicine

JF - American Journal of Preventive Medicine

SN - 0749-3797

IS - 4

ER -