Prospective Phase 2 Trial of Permanent Seed Implantation Prostate Brachytherapy for Intermediate-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer: Efficacy, Toxicity, and Quality of Life Outcomes

Steven J. Frank, Thomas J. Pugh, Pierre Blanchard, Usama Mahmood, William J. Graber, Rajat J. Kudchadker, John W. Davis, Jeri Kim, Haesun Choi, Patricia Troncoso, Deborah A. Kuban, Seungtaek Choi, Sean McGuire, Karen E. Hoffman, Hsiang Chun Chen, Xuemei Wang, David A. Swanson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

40 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: To report the efficacy, physician-reported toxicity, and patient-reported outcomes of men with intermediate-risk prostate cancer after brachytherapy in a prospective phase 2 trial. Methods and Materials: This prospective phase 2 trial involved 300 patients with previously untreated prostate cancer treated from 2006 through 2013. Eligible patients had ≤cT2b (T3 excluded according to magnetic resonance imaging), Gleason score (GS) 6 with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level 10-15 ng/mL, or GS 7 with PSA <10 ng/mL, and were treated with prostate brachytherapy (without hormonal therapy). Results: Median patient age was 64.9 years; 3.7% had GS 6, 78.7% had GS 7 (3+4), and 17.7% had GS 7 (4+3). Median follow-up time was 5.1 years. Median PSA at 5 years was 0.01 ng/mL (range, 0-6.0 ng/mL). Ten biochemical failures occurred, for a 5-year freedom from biochemical failure rate of 97.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 95.1-99.5), and 16 patients died, only 1 from prostate cancer, for 5-year rates of overall and biochemical progression–free survival of 94.9% (95% CI, 92.1-97.9) and 92.7% (95% CI, 89.3-96.2%). Four patients had late grade 3 genitourinary toxicity, and 2 patients had late grade 3 rectal toxicity; no grade 4 or 5 toxicity was observed. Rates of “moderate or big problems” at 4 years were 7.4% for urinary (vs 0.4% at baseline), 2.9% bowel (vs 0.4%), and 29.7% sexual function (vs 19.7%). Most men were “satisfied or extremely satisfied” (91% at 2 years after treatment and 93% at 4 years). Conclusions: Brachytherapy monotherapy is safe and effective and leads to good quality of life for some men with localized intermediate-risk prostate cancer.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)374-382
Number of pages9
JournalInternational Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
Volume100
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2018

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Radiation
  • Oncology
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging
  • Cancer Research

MD Anderson CCSG core facilities

  • Biostatistics Resource Group

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prospective Phase 2 Trial of Permanent Seed Implantation Prostate Brachytherapy for Intermediate-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer: Efficacy, Toxicity, and Quality of Life Outcomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this