Radiation-induced lymphopenia risks of photon versus proton therapy for esophageal cancer patients

Saba Ebrahimi, Gino Lim, Amy Liu, Steven H. Lin, Susannah G. Ellsworth, Clemens Grassberger, Radhe Mohan, Wenhua Cao

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: To assess possible differences in radiation-induced lymphocyte depletion for esophageal cancer patients being treated with the following 3 treatment modalities: intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), passive scattering proton therapy (PSPT), and intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT). Methods and Materials: We used 2 prediction models to estimate lymphocyte depletion based on dose distributions. Model I used a piecewise linear relationship between lymphocyte survival and voxel-by-voxel dose. Model II assumes that lymphocytes deplete exponentially as a function of total delivered dose. The models can be fitted using the weekly absolute lymphocyte counts measurements collected throughout treatment. We randomly selected 45 esophageal cancer patients treated with IMRT, PSPT, or IMPT at our institution (15 per modality) to demonstrate the fitness of the 2 models. A different group of 10 esophageal cancer patients who had received PSPT were included in this study of in silico simulations of multiple modalities. One IMRT and one IMPT plan were created, using our standards of practice for each modality, as competing plans to the existing PSPT plan for each patient. We fitted the models by PSPT plans used in treatment and predicted absolute lymphocyte counts for IMRT and IMPT plans. Results: Model validation on each modality group of patients showed good agreement between measured and predicted absolute lymphocyte counts nadirs with mean squared errors from 0.003 to 0.023 among the modalities and models. In the simulation study of IMRT and IMPT on the 10 PSPT patients, the average predicted absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) nadirs were 0.27, 0.35, and 0.37 K/lL after IMRT, PSPT, and IMPT treatments using Model I, respectively, and 0.14, 0.22, and 0.33 K/lL using Model II. Conclusions: Proton plans carried a lower predicted risk of lymphopenia after the treatment course than did photon plans. Moreover, IMPT plans outperformed PSPT in terms of predicted lymphocyte preservation.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)17-27
Number of pages11
JournalInternational Journal of Particle Therapy
Volume8
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2021

Keywords

  • IMPT
  • IMRT
  • Lymphopenia
  • PSPT

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
  • Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Radiation-induced lymphopenia risks of photon versus proton therapy for esophageal cancer patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this