Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Real-World Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Multiple Myeloma Previously Treated With Lenalidomide and an Anti-CD38 Monoclonal Antibody

  • Karthik Ramasamy
  • , Ravi Vij
  • , David Kuter
  • , David Cella
  • , Brian G.M. Durie
  • , Rafat Abonour
  • , Robert M. Rifkin
  • , Sikander Ailawadhi
  • , Hans C. Lee
  • , Andrew J. Cowan
  • , Carrie Ho
  • , Sujith Dhanasiri
  • , Susan Fish
  • , Edward Yu
  • , Amol D. Dhamane
  • , Jiaqi Fang
  • , Thomas S. Marshall
  • , Amir Samuel
  • , Liang Liu
  • , Jessica Katz
  • Tao Gu, Sundar Jagannath

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: This analysis explored real-world characteristics, treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) previously treated with lenalidomide and an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody (mAb) and requiring subsequent treatment. Materials and Methods: The PREAMBLE and Connect MM prospective registries of patients with multiple myeloma (MM), and the US nationwide Flatiron Health electronic health record-derived de-identified database were analysed. MM-specific treatment patterns (prior/index therapies) and outcomes (progression-free survival [PFS]/overall survival [OS]) were assessed. Results: This analysis included: PREAMBLE n = 215; Connect MM n = 232; Flatiron Health n = 845. Median age at index was 69.0 years, median 3 prior lines of therapy; > 50% male. The most common index regimens accounted < 15% of treatments (most common PREAMBLE, Connect MM: carfilzomib±dexamethasone; Flatiron Health: pomalidomide+daratumumab+dexamethasone); most patients received classes that they had previously; ≥ 93% were triple-class exposed (immunomodulatory drug, proteasome inhibitor, anti-CD38 mAb). In PREAMBLE, Connect MM and Flatiron Health, respectively: 80.9%, 68.1% and 77.2% were lenalidomide- and anti-CD38 mAb-refractory; 69.3%, 67.2% and 71.1% were triple-class refractory (TCR); median PFS: 5.2 (95% CI 3.7-6.7), 4.4 (3.5-5.6) and 5.3 months (4.8-6.0); median OS: 19.3 (15.8-26.1), 14.2 (11.0-16.9) and 23.1 months (19.0-28.6). PFS and OS were shorter in lenalidomide- and anti-CD38 mAb-refractory patients versus those who were not refractory to both. A similar pattern was observed for TCR patients versus non-TCR patients. Conclusion: There is no uniform standard of care for patients with RRMM with prior exposure to lenalidomide and anti-CD38 mAbs. Survival outcomes are poor, with a need for effective treatments for these patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)337-348.e2
JournalClinical Lymphoma, Myeloma and Leukemia
Volume25
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2025

Keywords

  • Immunomodulatory drugs
  • Monoclonal antibodies
  • Observational
  • Relapsed/refractory Multiple myeloma
  • Standard of care
  • Survival outcomes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Hematology
  • Oncology
  • Cancer Research

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Real-World Treatment Patterns and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Multiple Myeloma Previously Treated With Lenalidomide and an Anti-CD38 Monoclonal Antibody'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this