Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Renal biopsies from donors with acute kidney injury show different molecular patterns according to the post-transplant function

  • Flavia Neri
  • , Maria Letizia Lo Faro
  • , Maria Kaisar
  • , Ka Ho Tam
  • , Martyna Borak
  • , Jan Lindeman
  • , Annalisa Angelini
  • , Marny Fedrigo
  • , Jesper Kers
  • , James Hunter
  • , Rutger Ploeg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The utilization of kidneys from donors with acute kidney injury (AKI) is often limited by unpredictable post-transplantation outcomes. The aim of our study was to identify protein mediators implicated in either recovery or failure of these organs. Forty kidney biopsies from donors with (20) and without AKI (20) were selected and then subdivided according to the post-transplant outcome defined as a threshold of 45 ml/min for the eGFR at 1 year from transplantation. Tissue homogenates were analysed by western blot to assess how the levels of 17 pre-selected proteins varied across the four groups. Samples from AKI kidneys with a poor outcome showed a fourfold increase in the levels of PPARg and twofold reduction of STAT1 compared to the other groups (p < 0.05). On the contrary, antioxidant enzymes including TRX1 and PRX3 were increased in the AKI kidneys with a good outcome (p < 0.05). An opposite trend was observed for the detoxifying enzyme GSTp which was significantly increased in the AKI group with poor versus good outcome (p < 0.05). The importance of lipid metabolism (PPARg) and inflammatory signals (STAT1) in the function recovery of these kidneys hints to the therapeutical targeting of the involved pathways in the setting of organ reconditioning.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number6643
JournalScientific reports
Volume14
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2024
Externally publishedYes

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • General

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Renal biopsies from donors with acute kidney injury show different molecular patterns according to the post-transplant function'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this